Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 685

RESPONSE (re #679 MOTION to Shorten Time Apple's Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing and Hearing on Apple's Motion to Compel Timely Production of Foreign-Language and Other Documents in Advance of Related Depositions ) filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Joby Martin, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Joby Martin, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Joby Martin, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Shorten)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129 kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th  555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 (650) 801-5000  Telephone: Facsimile: (650) 801-5100   Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017  Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100   Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,  INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION   APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)  DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON ITS MOTION TO COMPEL  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendant.  Date: Time: Place: Judge: February 1, 2011 10:00 a.m. Courtroom 5, 4th Floor Hon. Paul S. Grewal   02198.51855/4575178.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 I, Joby Martin, declare as follows:  1. I am an associate in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,  counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung  Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I submit this declaration in  support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing and Hearing on  Apple’s Motion to Compel. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration  and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such facts under oath.  2. On January 16, 2012, Samsung and Apple held a meet and confer session between  lead counsel, during which Apple stated that it would file a motion requesting reconsideration of  the Court’s December 22, 2011 Order unless Samsung agreed to produce all foreign-language  documents at least ten days prior to the corresponding deposition.  3. At 7:05 p.m. on January 27, 2012, counsel for Apple emailed counsel for Samsung  to announce that it would move to shorten time for briefing and hearing of this motion. Although  this email did not include a proposed expedited briefing schedule, Apple demanded that Samsung  consent to shortened time before 8:00 p.m that evening. A true and correct copy of this email is  attached hereto as Exhibit 1.  4. Counsel for Samsung immediately responded via email by seeking clarification as  to which issues Apple would address in its motion to compel and requesting additional time to  confer internally and with Samsung regarding Apple’s request for a shortened schedule. True and  correct copies of these emails are attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Apple did not respond to  Samsung’s request.  I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America  that the foregoing is true and correct.  Executed on January 29, 2012, at San Francisco, California.    /s/ Joby Martin Joby Martin   02198.51855/4575178.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) -1DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 2 General Order 45 Attestation I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that Joby Martin has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 /s/ Victoria Maroulis 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4575178.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) -2DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO APPLE’ MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?