Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
691
MOTION to Permit Samsung's Expert Samuel Lucente to Review Materials Designated Under the Protective Order filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 2/7/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Responses due by 2/3/2012. Replies due by 2/6/2012. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Albert P. Bedecarre, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/30/2012)
EXHIBIT C
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000
FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522
MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP
N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO ,
L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O ,
SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O ,
D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A,
WASH I N G T O N , D .C.
T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S,
BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G
WWW.MOFO.COM
January 4, 2012
Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6024
MMazza@mofo.com
Via E-Mail (diane hutnyan@quinnemanuel.com)
Diane Hutnyan
Quinn Emanuel
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Re:
Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Diane:
This letter provides Apple’s agenda for the December 5, 2012, lead trial counsel meeting. In
attendance will be Harold McElhinny, Richard Hung, Samuel Maselli, and myself.
We suggest that the parties alternate discussion of their respective issues, so that we address
one item on Apple’s agenda, then one item on Samsung’s agenda, and so forth.
Sufficiency of Samsung’s search for relevant documents from inventors;
Production of Samsung sales-related and other financial documents;
Sufficiency of expedited production of source code and related technical documents
under the December 22, 2011 Order;
Expanded production of Samsung technical documents
Production of Samsung design-around documents, including but not limited to
documents regarding blue-glow functionality;
Production of Samsung documents related to Apple’s trademark and trade dress
claims;
Production of Samsung marketing- and advertising-related documents;
Sufficiency of Samsung’s expedited production of design history documents under
the December 22, 2011, Order;
Expanded production of Samsung design history documents;
Protective Order Regarding Disclosure and Use of Discovery Materials;
sf-3090216
Diane Hutnyan
January 4, 2012
Page Two
Completeness of Samsung’s December 31, 2011 production of surveys and designer
emails;
Samsung’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice;
Production of Samsung documents related to specific surveys called out in Apple
correspondence;
Production of Samsung documents related to Samsung’s participation in standardssetting organizations;
Production of Samsung documents relating to its licenses and license negotiations
regarding patents declared standards essential;
Samsung’s response to Apple Interrogatory Nos. 8 and 9 (Conception and Reduction
to Practice of Samsung Patents-in-Suit);
Expert issues related to Messrs. Bressler, Sowayan, and Lucente; and
Scheduling of remaining depositions of Samsung witnesses in January and early
February.
Sincerely,
/s/ Mia Mazza
Mia Mazza
cc:
Samuel Maselli
S. Calvin Walden
Peter Kolovos
sf-3090216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?