Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 712

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Joby Martin In Support of Apple's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Proposed Order Granting Apple's Motion to File Documents Under Seal)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 2/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th  555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,  INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION   APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SEALING APPLE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXHIBITS 24 AND 46 – 48 TO THE MUELLER DECLARATION IN SUPPORT THEREOF, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(d) Plaintiff,  vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendant.     1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SEALING APPLE‘S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d), Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung 2 Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively 3 ―Samsung‖) submit the appended declaration of Joby Martin in support of Apple‘s Administrative 4 Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Dkt. No. 660), and to establish that the following are 5 sealable: 6 • 7 8 Confidential Portions of Apple‘s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (―Motion for Partial Summary Judgment‖); and • Exhibits 24 and 46 – 48 to the Declaration of Joseph J. Mueller in Support of Apple‘s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (―Mueller Declaration‖). 9 10 DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN 11 I, Joby Martin, do hereby declare as follows: 12 1. I am an associate at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, counsel for 13 Samsung. I submit this Declaration in support of Apple‘s Administrative Motion to File 14 Documents Under Seal (Dkt. No. 660). I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this 15 Declaration and, if called as a witness, could and would competently testify to them. 16 2. Exhibit 24 to the Mueller Declaration consists of excerpts from the deposition 17 transcription of Dr. Hyeon-Woo Lee, a Samsung witness and the inventor of the ‗604 Patent. This 18 document contains confidential business information concerning Dr. Lee‘s work leading to the 19 patent-in-suit, Samsung's internal organization and structure in handling patent applications, the 20 relationship between proprietary Samsung technology and 3GPP specifications, as well as 21 Samsung‘s internal policies and practices relating to its participation in standards bodies. This 22 document has been designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY 23 and would cause substantial competitive harm to Samsung if not filed under seal. 24 3. Exhibit 46 to the Mueller Declaration is a true and correct copy of the Patent Cross 25 License Agreement Between Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Intel Corporation, with an 26 effective date of January 1, 1993. This document contains confidential business information 27 concerning internal valuations of intellectual property belonging to Samsung and Intel, 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SEALING APPLE‘S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 specifications of numerous Samsung and Intel technologies, and the parties' business practices 2 with respect to licensed products. This agreement is subject to a non-disclosure provision 3 whereby both parties agree to keep the terms of the agreement confidential. Accordingly, this 4 document has been designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY 5 and would cause substantial harm to Samsung and to third party Intel Corporation if not filed 6 under seal. 7 4. Exhibit 47 to the Mueller Declaration is a true and correct copy of Amendment 8 Number 1 to the Patent Cross License Agreement Between Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and 9 Intel Corporation Having an Effective Date of January 1, 1993, with an Amendment Date of 10 March 18, 2003. As with the underlying license agreement, this amendment contains confidential 11 business information, including information about Samsung's policies relating to taxes, as well as 12 its financial and accounting systems. The amendment is subject to a non-disclosure provision 13 whereby both parties agree to keep the terms of the amended agreement confidential. 14 Accordingly, this document has been designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — 15 ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY and would cause substantial harm to Samsung and third party Intel 16 Corporation if not filed under seal. 17 5. Exhibit 48 to the Mueller Declaration is a true and correct copy of Amendment 18 Number 2 to the Patent Cross License Agreement Between Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and 19 Intel Corporation Having an Effective Date of January 1, 1993, with an Effective Date of July 1, 20 2004. As with the underlying license agreement and amended agreement, this amendment 21 contains confidential business information, including information concerning the configuration of 22 Samsung Intel products and internal valuations of intellectual property belonging to Samsung and 23 Intel. The amendment is subject to a non-disclosure provision whereby both parties agree to keep 24 the terms of the amended agreement confidential. Accordingly, this document has been 25 designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS‘ EYES ONLY and would cause 26 substantial harm to Samsung and third party Intel Corporation if not filed under seal. 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -3DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SEALING APPLE‘S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 6. Apple‘s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, on pages 7, 10-11, and 16, 2 summarizes, describes and/or directly cites to the confidential exhibits discussed in paragraphs 2 3 through 5 above. Therefore, the motion should remain under seal for the same reasons articulated 4 above. 5 7. The requested relief is necessary and narrowly tailored to protect this confidential 6 information. The exhibits described above do not contain significant relevant, non-confidential 7 material. 8 I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my 9 knowledge. 10 Executed this 2nd day of February, 2012, in San Francisco, CA. 11 12 13 /s/ Joby Martin Joby Martin 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -4DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SEALING APPLE‘S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 2 General Order 45 Attestation I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that Joby Martin has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 /s/ Victoria Maroulis 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -5DECLARATION OF JOBY MARTIN IN SUPPORT OF SEALING APPLE‘S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?