Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 713

OPPOSITION to ( #658 First MOTION for Leave to Supplement Its Infringement Contentions ) filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Hung Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Proposed Order)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/3/2012) Modified text on 2/6/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Page 1 of 11 From: Todd Briggs [toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:09 PM To: Todd Briggs; Ow, Eric W; Hung, Richard S. J.; Victoria Maroulis Cc: Jacobs, Michael A. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Attachments: Stipulation_re_New_Products QE Redlines.DOC Mike and Eric, Here is a new redline. We edited one sentence to make clear that we only provided Apple with 3 claim charts in early January and that Samsung will be serving supplemental contentions for the other 9 Samsung patents as well. We also do not agree that the parties cannot retake depositions. That language needs to be removed as I explained last night. Mike – Can we have a call in an hour or so to finalize this? Thanks, Todd From: Todd Briggs Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:11 PM To: 'Ow, Eric W'; Hung, Richard S. J.; Victoria Maroulis Cc: Jacobs, Michael A. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Eric, Can you explain what would constitute good cause to retake a deposition? Thanks, Todd From: Ow, Eric W [mailto:EOw@mofo.com] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:24 AM To: Todd Briggs; Hung, Richard S. J.; Victoria Maroulis Cc: Jacobs, Michael A. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Todd, I understand that Rich is out-of-office. Here is a revised version and redline. Eric From: Todd Briggs [mailto:toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:27 PM To: Ow, Eric W; Hung, Richard S. J.; Victoria Maroulis Cc: Jacobs, Michael A. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Page 2 of 11 Eric, I accepted all of the changes in the redline you sent and made a few additional redlines in the attached document. We removed the statement Apple added regarding the retaking of depositions. Samsung cannot stipulate to that. However, Apple is free to argue that retaking of depositions should not be allowed in the event the issue arises. Todd From: Ow, Eric W [mailto:EOw@mofo.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:20 PM To: Hung, Richard S. J.; Victoria Maroulis Cc: Todd Briggs; Jacobs, Michael A. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Todd, I understand that Rich and Vicki are out-of-office. Rich asked me to forward this to you. Regards, Eric From: Hung, Richard S. J. Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:04 AM To: 'victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com' Cc: 'toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com'; Jacobs, Michael A.; Ow, Eric W Subject: Re: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Vicki I received this - thanks. My client proposed an edit late last night, and we are revising the draft for their review now. We should be able to send you a draft by mid-afternoon. (Sorry - I also am OOO.) Rich From: Victoria Maroulis [mailto:victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 06:24 AM To: Hung, Richard S. J. Cc: Todd Briggs <toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com> Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Rich, I am traveling all day today. Please work with Todd to get the stipulation finalized as soon as possible. Thanks. Vicki Page 3 of 11 From: Hung, Richard S. J. [mailto:RHung@mofo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 6:19 PM To: Victoria Maroulis; Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Hi Vicki, A few of our folks (both at Apple and WH) are in the air right now, unfortunately, so the further extension that we discussed would be helpful. Attached is a draft. As not to jam us up again, I've proposed Thursday for our opp. and Monday for your reply (giving you the weekend, if necessary). If you want the dates earlier, though, please let me know. Thanks -- Rich Richard S.J. Hung Morrison & Foerster LLP rhung@mofo.com (415) 268-7602 From: Victoria Maroulis [mailto:victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:59 PM To: Hung, Richard S. J.; Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Rich, We have some questions and comments that may be best resolved by a call. Can Todd and I call you or whoever else wants to talk in about 15 min? Vicki From: Hung, Richard S. J. [mailto:RHung@mofo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:47 PM To: Victoria Maroulis; Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Vicki, Here is a revised version and a redline. Please let us know your thoughts by 6PM, as our opposition is due tonight. Thanks -- Rich Page 4 of 11 Richard S.J. Hung Morrison & Foerster LLP rhung@mofo.com (415) 268-7602 From: Victoria Maroulis [mailto:victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:00 PM To: Hung, Richard S. J.; Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Mike, Attached is a slightly revised redlined stipulation. Please let us know if you have any questions or revisions. Thank you. Victoria Maroulis Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5022 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. From: Victoria Maroulis Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:21 PM To: Hung, Richard S. J.; Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Mike, Attached is the revised draft stipulation. We hope to provide you the final sign-off and any additional edits tomorrow morning. Todd and I are available for another call in the morning if we need it. Page 5 of 11 Thanks. Victoria Maroulis Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5022 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. From: Victoria Maroulis Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:23 PM To: Hung, Richard S. J.; Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Mike, Rich, Mark, Peter, We are close to an agreement, but we still need sign off from a few people on the revised stipulation. It would be safest to file a stipulation right now seeking an extra day from the court for Apple’s opposition. However, if you would rather try to get it done today, we will do our best to get back to you in a few hours. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thanks. Victoria Maroulis Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5022 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. From: Hung, Richard S. J. [mailto:RHung@mofo.com] Page 6 of 11 Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:25 PM To: Victoria Maroulis; Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Vicki -Attached is the draft stip. Rich Richard S.J. Hung Morrison & Foerster LLP rhung@mofo.com (415) 268-7602 From: Victoria Maroulis [mailto:victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 2:57 PM To: Jacobs, Michael A.; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Hung, Richard S. J.; Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Mike, Mark, and Peter, Thank you for making time for the call this morning. As I mentioned on the call, we would appreciate seeing a revised proposed stipulation as soon as possible while we are waiting to hear from Samsung. Best, Victoria Maroulis Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5022 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. From: Jacobs, Michael A. [mailto:MJacobs@mofo.com] Page 7 of 11 Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 6:13 AM To: Victoria Maroulis; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Cc: Hung, Richard S. J.; Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com; Knisely, Cyndi L. Subject: Re: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Vicki, Let's shoot for 10 am today. Please use 1 800 650 4949/268 7455. Michael From: Victoria Maroulis [mailto:victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 06:07 AM To: Jacobs, Michael A.; 'Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com' <Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com> Cc: Hung, Richard S. J.; Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs <toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com>; Kenneth Suh <KennethSuh@quinnemanuel.com>; Bill Trac <BillTrac@quinnemanuel.com>; 'Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com' <Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com>; 'peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com' <peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com> Subject: RE: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Mike, Thank you for your email. Because of the time difference, we will not be able to give you Samsung ’s definitive response until around 5 pm PST today which is Tuesday morning Korea time. Since Apple ’s opposition can be filed any time until midnight tonight should the parties not reach agreement, that ought to be workable. In the meantime, Todd and I will call you think morning to discuss and clarify the scope of Apple ’s proposal. Can you please advise what time you are available and please forward us Apple’s proposed amended contentions this morning so that we can discuss those on the call as well? Thank you. Victoria Maroulis Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5022 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. From: Jacobs, Michael A. [mailto:MJacobs@mofo.com] Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 8:30 PM To: Victoria Maroulis; Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com Page 8 of 11 Cc: Hung, Richard S. J.; Bartlett, Jason R.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs; Kenneth Suh; Bill Trac; Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com; peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com Subject: Re: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846- LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Vicki, Consistent with Judge Koh's encouragement in her order shortening time, we agree that both parties should discuss possible compromises regarding adding new products to this litigation. We understand that Samsung has rejected Apple's proposal to add 18 Samsung newly -released products to this litigation, in exchange for Samsung's addition of the iPhone 4S. We also are mindful of both parties' desire to preserve the July 30, 2012 trial date and Judge Koh's suggestion at the recent Markman tutorial that the parties consider ways to streamline this case for trial. With that background, we have revisited the proposed stipulation that Mark Selwyn forwarded on January 6, 2012 for possible compromises. We have concluded that six products were unnecessarily included on this list, as they were previously covered by our earlier infringement contentions. These are: (1) the Galaxy S II Skyrocket & Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch (covered by our contentions directed to the "Galaxy S II"); (2) the Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus and 8.9 (covered by our "Galaxy Tab" contentions); and (3) the Gravity Smart and Showcase i500 (identical to the "Gravity" and "Galaxy Showcase," respectively, in our prior contentions). As for the remaining 12 products, in the spirit of compromise, we propose that the parties each amend their contentions to add one new product. Samsung would add the iPhone 4S, and Apple would add the Galaxy Nexus. The parties would reaffirm that this agreement would not cause the trial date to slip or be argued as a basis for delay. Infringement claims against other products would be brought in other lawsuits. Please let us know your thoughts by tomorrow morning at 10AM. If it would be helpful to have a call to discuss these issues early tomorrow morning, we are available. Michael From: Victoria Maroulis [mailto:victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:14 PM To: 'Selwyn, Mark' <Mark.Selwyn@wilmerhale.com>; 'Kolovos, Peter' <Peter.Kolovos@wilmerhale.com>; 'Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com' <Sam.Maselli@wilmerhale.com> Cc: Hung, Richard S. J.; Bartlett, Jason R.; Jacobs, Michael A.; McElhinny, Harold J.; Todd Briggs <toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com>; Kenneth Suh <KennethSuh@quinnemanuel.com>; Bill Trac <BillTrac@quinnemanuel.com> Subject: FW: Activity in Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Order on Motion to Shorten Time Mark and Peter, In today’s Court order on Samsung’s Motion to Shorten, the Court requested that the parties renew their negotiations regarding the addition of iPhone 4S to the case and attempt to submit a stipulation before the close briefing on February 2. Please consider the Court’s instruction and advise whether Apple would consent to Samsung’s supplementation of its infringement contentions. Thank you. Victoria Maroulis Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5022 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?