Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
715
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Administration to File Documents Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Apple Inc.'s Motion for Rule 37(B)(2) Sanctions for Samsung's Violation of Two Discovery Orders, #2 Declaration of Minn Cheung in Support of Apple's Motion for Sanctions, #3 Exhibit T to Chung Declaration, #4 Exhibit V to Chung Declaration, #5 Exhibit Y to Chung Declaration, #6 Exhibit Z to Chung Declaration, #7 Exhibit AA to Chung Declaration, #8 Proposed Order Granting Apple's Motion for Sanctions, #9 Proposed Order Granting Admin Motion)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 2/8/2012)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
6
7
8
9
10
APPLE, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO.,
LTD., ET AL,
DEFENDANT.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CV-11-1846-LHK
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 19, 2012
PAGES 1-276
11
12
13
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
A P P E A R A N C E S:
16
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP
BY: MICHAEL JACOBS
JASON BARTLETT
HAROLD MCELHINNY
MIA MAZZA
425 MARKET STREET, 34TH FL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
QUINN EMANUEL
BY: DIANE HUTNYAN
865 S. FIGUEROA ST., 10TH FL
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(APPEARANCES CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE)
24
25
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER: SUMMER FISHER, CSR, CRR
CERTIFICATE NUMBER 13185
1
1
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
WILMER HALE
BY: MARK SELWYN
CALVIN WALDEN
950 PAGE MILL ROAD
PALO ALTO, CA 94304
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
QUINN EMANUEL
BY: VICTORIA MAROULIS
RACHEL KASSABIAN
JOBY MARTIN
KEN SUH
SCOTT HALL
555 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE, 5TH FL
REDWOOD SHORES, CA 94065
ALSO PRESENT:
CHRISTOPHER KELLY
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
1
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA
2
P R O C E E D I N G S
3
4
(WHEREUPON, COURT CONVENED AND THE
FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HELD:)
5
6
JANUARY 19, 2012
THE COURT:
MR. RIVERA, WOULD YOU CALL
THE NEXT MATTER ON THIS MORNING'S CALENDAR.
7
THE CLERK:
8
CALLING APPLE, INC. VERSUS SAMSUNG
9
ELECTRONICS.
10
11
YES, YOUR HONOR.
CASE NUMBER CV-11-1846.
MATTER ON FOR APPLE AND SAMSUNG DISCOVERY
MOTIONS.
12
COUNSEL, PLEASE STATE YOUR APPEARANCES.
13
MR. JACOBS:
14
MICHAEL JACOBS FROM MORRISON
& FOERSTER, YOUR HONOR, FOR APPLE.
15
WITH ME FROM MORRISON & FOERSTER IS
16
JASON BARTLETT, HAROLD MCELHINNY AND MIA MAZZA AT
17
COUNSEL TABLE.
18
THE COURT:
GOOD MORNING, COUNSEL.
19
MR. WALDEN:
20
FROM WILMER HALE, MARK SELWYN.
GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
AND WITH
21
ME TODAY IS MY PARTNER CALVIN WALDEN ALSO OF WILMER
22
HALE.
23
THE COURT:
GOOD MORNING AS WELL.
24
MS. MAROULIS:
25
VICTORIA MAROULIS, WITH QUINN EMANUEL,
GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
3
1
ACCUSATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN A VIOLATION OF
2
YOUR HONOR'S PRIOR ORDERS.
3
IT WAS MENTIONED IN THE BRIEF, IT WAS
4
MENTIONED JUST NOW BY MR. JACOBS SPECIFICALLY
5
REGARDING THE MERCY EXTENSION OF TIME THAT WE ASKED
6
FOR OVER THE CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY.
7
I WANT TO BE CRYSTAL CLEAR ABOUT THAT.
8
THE ORDER SAID ANY DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN
9
PRODUCED PURSUANT TO THE SEPTEMBER 28TH ORDER MUST
10
BE PRODUCED BY DECEMBER 31ST OR THERE MAY BE
11
SANCTIONS.
12
WE -- ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT WERE
13
ORDERED PRODUCED BY SEPTEMBER 28TH HAD ALREADY BEEN
14
PRODUCED PURSUANT TO THAT ORDER IN DECEMBER.
15
POINT OF THAT REQUEST WAS TWO FOLD, THE EXTENSION
16
REQUEST.
17
THE
ONE, IT WAS BECAUSE AFTER THE PRODUCTION
18
HAD BEEN MADE PURSUANT TO THE SEPTEMBER 28TH ORDER,
19
SAMSUNG DISCOVERED A FEW ADDITIONAL CUSTODIANS ON
20
SURVEYS.
21
YOU'RE BEING VERY CONSERVATIVE, ONE COULD ARGUE
22
WELL, THOSE ARE SURVEY DOCUMENTS THAT FIT THE
23
DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER SO YOU REALLY SHOULD GET
24
THOSE OUT BY --
25
AND SO DEPENDING ON HOW YOU READ THAT, IF
THE COURT:
THAT'S NOT REALLY A CLOSE
159
1
CALL, IS IT?
IT'S NOT BEING CONSERVATIVE, THE
2
SURVEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRODUCED MONTHS BEFORE.
3
MS. KASSABIAN:
4
BUT I'M SAYING THAT DESPITE OUR
5
6
RIGHT.
INVESTIGATIONS WE FOUND NEW CUSTODIANS.
WE DIDN'T WITHHOLD ANYTHING, THERE WERE
7
JUST WITNESSES THAT CAME TO LIGHT MONTHS LATER.
8
REALIZED THESE PEOPLE HAD TO DO SURVEYS, SO WE
9
GATHERED THEIR DOCUMENTS WHICH WERE MASSIVE AND WE
10
BELIEVED THAT THAT WAS GOING TO MAYBE TRICKLE ON
11
WE
PAST DECEMBER 31ST.
12
SO IT WASN'T THAT THEY WERE WITHHELD, IT
13
WASN'T THAT GOOD FAITH INVESTIGATION HADN'T
14
HAPPENED, IT WAS THAT WHEN WE DISCOVERED A COUPLE
15
ADDITIONAL SURVEY CUSTODIANS, WE INTERPRETED YOUR
16
ORDER TO SAY THOSE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE OUT BY
17
DECEMBER 31ST.
18
IT TURNS OUT WE WERE ABLE TO DO THAT, YOU
19
KNOW, WITH SOME LATE NIGHTS WE WERE ABLE TO GET
20
THOSE DOCUMENTS OUT BY THE DECEMBER 22ND ORDER
21
DEADLINE WHICH WAS NEW YEARS EVE.
22
OUT, THERE WAS NO VIOLATION
23
THE COURT:
SO THOSE DID GET
SO YOU ARE STANDING HERE
24
REPRESENTING TO ME THAT EVERY DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO
25
MY SEPTEMBER 28TH AND DECEMBER 22ND ORDERS WAS
160
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
5
6
7
8
9
I, THE UNDERSIGNED OFFICIAL COURT
REPORTER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
10
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 280 SOUTH
11
FIRST STREET, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY
12
CERTIFY:
13
THAT THE FOREGOING TRANSCRIPT,
14
CERTIFICATE INCLUSIVE, CONSTITUTES A TRUE, FULL AND
15
CORRECT TRANSCRIPT OF MY SHORTHAND NOTES TAKEN AS
16
SUCH OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER OF THE PROCEEDINGS
17
HEREINBEFORE ENTITLED AND REDUCED BY COMPUTER-AIDED
18
TRANSCRIPTION TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY.
19
20
21
22
23
__________________________
SUMMER A. FISHER, CSR, CRR
CERTIFICATE NUMBER 13185
24
25
276
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?