Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
721
AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #667 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions DECLARATION OF RICHARD S.J. HUNG IN SUPPORT OF APPLES OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNGS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Related document(s) #667 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/9/2012)
quinn emanuel
trial lawyers I san francisco
50 California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 941114788 I TEL: (415) 875-6600 FAX: (415) 375-6700
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL No.
(415) 875-6423
WRITER'S INTERNET ADDRESS
brianmack@quinnemanuel.com
December 7, 2011
Synaptics, Inc.
3120 Scott Blvd., Ste 130
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Re:
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, No. 11-CV-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Synaptics Representative:
Enclosed please find a Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action issued by the United
States District Court for Northern District of California. This deposition testimony is being
sought by Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. in connection with litigation against Apple Inc., Apple
Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 11-CV-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal.).
Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions or concerns; we look forward to working with
you to make this process as expedient and convenient for you as possible.
Very truly yours,
c_
Brian Mack
quinn emanuel urquhart &
865 South Figueroa Street, loth Floor, Los Angeles. California 90017-2543 I TEL (213) 443-3000 FAX (213) 443-3100
51 Madison Avenue. 22nd Floor. New York, New York 10010-1601 TEL (212) 849-7000 FAX (212) 849-7100
LOS ANGELES I
NEW YORK I
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 TEL (650) 801-5000 FAX (650) 801-5100
W. Madison Street . , Suite 2450. Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510 TEL (312) 705-7400 FAX (312)705-7401
SILICON VALLEY I
CHICAGO1500
1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 825, Washington, District of Columbia 20004-2400 1Ta. (202) 538-8000 FAX (202) 538-8100
16 Old Bailey. London EC4M 7E0. United Kingdom TEL +44(0) 20 7653 2000 FAX +44(0) 20 7653 2100
NW' Hibiya
25E, 1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, japan TEL -F8 I 3 5510 1711 FAX +81 3 5510 1712
WASHINGTON, DC I
LONDON I
TOKYO I
MANNHEIM I Erzbergerstratle 5, 68165 Mannheim, Germany 1TEL +49(0) 621 43298 6000 FAX +49(0) 621 43298 6100
MOSCOW! Voentorg Building, 3rd Floor, 10 Vozdvizhenka Street, Moscow 125009, Russia 1TEL +7 495 797 3666 FAX +7 495 797 3667
AO 88A (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Northern District of California
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff
V.
Civil Action No.
11-cv-01846-LIIK
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: Synaptics, Inc.
3120 Scott Blvd., Ste 130, Santa Clara, CA 95054
Z Testimony: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at a
deposition to be taken in this civil action. If you are an organization that is not a party in this case, you must designate
one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on your behalf about
the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment: See Attachment A.
Place:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Date and Time:
Dec. 22, 2011 at 9 a.m.
The deposition will be recorded by this method: The deposition will be videotaped and recorded
stenographically.
Z
Production: You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents,
electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the
material: See Attachment B.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule
45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are
attached.
Date:
Dec. 7, 2011
CLERK OF COURT
OR
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
6__
Attorney's signature
The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
Brian E. Mack, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan, LLP, 50 California Street, 22 nd Floor, San Francisco, California
94111; Email: brianmack@quinnemanuel.com; Telephone: 415-875-6423
02198.51855/4493755.1
AO 88A (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No.
11-cv-01846-LHK
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)
This subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any)
was received by me on (date)
E I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named individual as follows:
on (date)
;
or
E I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also
tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of
$
My fees are $
for travel and $
for services, for a total of $
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:
Server 's signature
Printed name and title
Server 's address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
AO 88A (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/1/07)
(c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or
(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably
compensated.
attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a
person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this
duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost
earnings and reasonable attorney's fees — on a party or attorney
who fails to comply.
(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information.
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce
documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or
to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the
place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear
for a deposition, hearing, or trial.
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or
tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or
attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to
inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or
to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored
information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be
served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14
days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the
following rules apply:
(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving
party may move the issuing court for an order compelling
production or inspection.
(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and
the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's
officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.
(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
(A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must
quash or modify a subpoena that:
(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
(ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer
to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is
employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that,
subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to
attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where
the trial is held;
(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if
no exception or waiver applies; or
(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
(B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by
a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the
subpoena if it requires:
(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,
development, or commercial information;
(ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that
does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from
the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or
(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to incur
substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.
(C) Specifiiing Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances
described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or
modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under
specified conditions if the serving party:
(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that
cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and
02198.51855/4493755.1
These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically
stored information:
(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce
documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary
course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to
the categories in the demand.
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not
Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing
electronically stored information, the person responding must
produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or
in a reasonably usable form or forms.
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One
Form. The person responding need not produce the same
electronically stored information in more than one form.
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person
responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored
information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably
accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel
discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show
that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue
burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless
order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows
good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The
court may specify conditions for the discovery.
(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.
(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed
information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to
protection as trial-preparation material must:
(i) expressly make the claim; and
(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents,
communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without
revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the
parties to assess the claim.
(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a
subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trialpreparation material, the person making the claim may notify any
party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.
After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use
or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take
reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it
before being notified; and may promptly present the information to
the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person
who produced the information must preserve the information until
the claim is resolved.
(e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person
who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the
subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if the
subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a
place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?