Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 729

RESPONSE (re #701 AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION to Amend/Correct #691 MOTION to Permit Samsung's Expert Samuel Lucente to Review Materials Designated Under the Protective Order ) CORRECTION OF DOCKET #727 (correcting event from Reply to Response) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/13/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
PERMIT SAMSUNG’S EXPERT
SAMUEL LUCENTE TO REVIEW
MATERIALS DESIGNATED
UNDER THE PROTECTIVE
ORDER

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3107050

1

Defendant Samsung seeks an order compelling Apple to allow Samsung’s expert, Samuel

2

Lucente, access to Apple’s “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and “Highly

3

Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code” under the Protective Order.

4

Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, Samsung’s

5

Motion to Permit Samsung’s Expert Samuel Lucente to Review Materials Designated Under the

6

Protective Order is DENIED.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated: March _____, 2012.

9
10
11

HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3107050

1