Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
729
RESPONSE (re #701 AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION to Amend/Correct #691 MOTION to Permit Samsung's Expert Samuel Lucente to Review Materials Designated Under the Protective Order ) CORRECTION OF DOCKET #727 (correcting event from Reply to Response) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
PERMIT SAMSUNG’S EXPERT
SAMUEL LUCENTE TO REVIEW
MATERIALS DESIGNATED
UNDER THE PROTECTIVE
ORDER
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3107050
1
Defendant Samsung seeks an order compelling Apple to allow Samsung’s expert, Samuel
2
Lucente, access to Apple’s “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and “Highly
3
Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code” under the Protective Order.
4
Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, Samsung’s
5
Motion to Permit Samsung’s Expert Samuel Lucente to Review Materials Designated Under the
6
Protective Order is DENIED.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: March _____, 2012.
9
10
11
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3107050
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?