Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 758

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Melissa Chan In Support of Samsung's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, #2 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion to Seal, #3 REDACTED Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Sanctions, #4 Declaration of Sara Jenkins In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Sanctions - REDACTED, #5 Exhibit A to Jenkins Declaration, #6 Exhibit B to Jenkins Declaration, #7 Exhibit C to Jenkins Declaration, #8 Exhibit D to Jenkins Declaration, #9 Exhibit E to Jenkins Declaration, #10 Exhibit F to Jenkins Declaration, #11 Exhibit G to Jenkins Declaration, #12 Exhibit H to Jenkins Declaration, #13 Exhibit I to Jenkins Declaration, #14 Exhibit J to Jenkins Declaration, #15 Exhibit K to Jenkins Declaration, #16 Exhibit L to Jenkins Declaration, #17 Exhibit M to Jenkins Declaration, #18 Exhibit N to Jenkins Declaration, #19 Exhibit O to Jenkins Declaration, #20 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 2/25/2012)

EXHIBIT B

1
2
3
4
5
6

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice anticipated)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant APPLE INC.

11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
APPLE’S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
TO SAMSUNG’S INTERROGATORIES 1,
3 AND/OR 6 TO APPLE RELATING TO
APPLE’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG’S
INTERROGATORY NOS. 1, 3 AND/OR 6 RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

1

Under Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 33, Apple

2

Inc. (“Apple”) supplements its objections and response to Samsung’s Interrogatories Nos. 1, 3

3

and/or 6 Relating to Apple Inc.’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, served on July 25, 2011.

4

Apple reserves the right to further supplement or amend these objections and response based on

5

its ongoing investigation of the facts, witnesses, and documents relating to this case.

6
7

GENERAL OBJECTIONS
1.

Apple incorporates by reference its general objections in Apple Inc.’ s Objections

8

and Responses to Samsung’s Interrogatories to Apple Relating to Apple Inc.’s Motion for a

9

Preliminary Injunction.

10
11

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES NOS 1, 3 AND/OR 6
Apple incorporates by reference its specific objections to each of Interrogatories Nos. 1, 3

12

and 6. Subject to and incorporating its General Objections and its specific objections, Apple

13

further responds based on its reasonable investigation in compliance with the requirements of

14

Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 33.

15

Pursuant to the September 13, 2011 Order Granting-In-Part and Denying-In-Part

16

Defendants’ Motion to Compel (D.N. 205) Apple identifies the “products that it has previously

17

accused of infringing one or more of the four patents at issue in Apple's preliminary injunction

18

motion” in “a complaint filed in a federal district court or in a correspondence to a third party.”

19

After conducting a reasonable investigation appropriate for the limited preliminary injunction

20

discovery, Apple responds that at least one Apple employee received information identifying or

21

announcing each of these products and each Samsung product accused in Apple’s Amended

22

Complaint (D.N. 75) products by no later than the date indicated below:

23

HTC Products.

24

HTC Hero (January 12, 2009)

25

HTC Droid Incredible (April 19, 2010)

26

HTC Droid Incredible 2 (April 25, 2011)

27

HTC Wildfire (July 22, 2010)

28

HTC T-Mobile myTouch 3G (March 4, 2010)
APPLE’S AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG’S
INTERROGATORY NOS. 1, 3 AND/OR 6 RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

1

HTC T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide (July 13, 2010)

2

HTC T-Mobile myTouch 4G (November 16, 2010)

3

HTC T-Mobile G1 (September 25, 2008)

4

HTC T-Mobile G2 (July 28, 2010)

5

HTC Aria (October 8, 2010)

6

HTC Desire (March 2, 2010)

7

HTC Merge (September 2, 2010)

8

HTC Inspire 4G (January 10, 2011)

9

HTC Evo Shift 4G (January 10, 2011)

10

HTC Thunderbolt 4G (January 9, 2011)

11

HTC Flyer (February 15, 2011)

12

HTC Jetstream (August 31, 2011)

13

HTC Evo View 4G (June 30, 2011)

14
15

Nokia Products.

16

Nokia N900 (August 27, 2009)

17

Nokia N8 (August 27, 2010)

18

Nokia C6 (April 22, 2010)

19

Nokia C7 (September 14, 2010)

20

Nokia E7 (September 14, 2010)

21
22

Samsung Products

23

Samsung Galaxy S 4G (April 9, 2011)

24

Droid Charge (May 14, 2011)

25

Infuse 4G (May 15, 2011)

26

Galaxy Tab 10.1 (February 13, 2011)

27

Samsung Acclaim (October 14, 2010)

28

Samsung Captivate (June 21, 2010)
APPLE’S AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG’S
INTERROGATORY NOS. 1, 3 AND/OR 6 RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

1

Samsung Continuum (November 22, 2010)

2

Exhibit 4G (June 16, 2011)

3

Epic 4G (August 25, 2010)

4

Fascinate (September 21, 2010)

5

Gem (April 15, 2011)

6

Galaxy Ace (February 9, 2011)

7

Galaxy Prevail (May 4, 2011)

8

Galaxy S (i9000) (March 24, 2010)

9

Gravity (March 22, 2010)

10

Indulge (February 9, 2011)

11

Infuse 4G (January 14, 2011)

12

Intercept (September 23, 2010)

13

Mesmerize (April 15, 2011)

14

Nexus S (November 29, 2010)

15

Nexus S 4G (March 22, 2011)

16

Replenish (April 2011)

17

Showcase i500 (January 17, 2011)

18

Showcase Galaxy S (June 16, 2011)

19

Sidekick (June 16, 2011)

20

Transform (October 8, 2010)

21

Vibrant (September 7, 2010)

22

Galaxy S II (aka Galaxy S 2) (February 14, 2011)

23

Galaxy Tab (June 15, 2010)

24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG’S
INTERROGATORY NOS. 1, 3 AND/OR 6 RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

1

Dated: September 30, 2011

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

2
3
4
5

By:

/s/ Richard S.J. Hung
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO SAMSUNG’S
INTERROGATORY NOS. 1, 3 AND/OR 6 RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK