Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 773

RESPONSE (re #736 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung's Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #3 Exhibit Samsung's Redacted Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel, #4 Declaration of Joby Martin In Support of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel, #5 Exhibit A to Declaration of Joby Martin, #6 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Compel)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 3/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com  555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS  AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.     Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Defendants Samsung 2 Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications 3 America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby bring this administrative motion for an order to 4 seal: 5 1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion 6 to Compel Apex Witnesses; and 7 2. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Joby Martin In Support 8 Of Samsung’s Opposition To Apple’s Motion To Compel Apex Witnesses. 9 Samsung has established good cause to permit filing these documents under seal through 10 the Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung’s Administrative Motion to File 11 Documents Under Seal, filed herewith. In short, the above documents discuss, refer to, or 12 comprise excerpts of depositions that Samsung has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 13 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY under the protective order, or reference declarations describing the 14 duties of high-ranking executives and the confidential business structure and practices of 15 Samsung. 16 Pursuant to General Order No. 62, Samsung’s entire filing will be lodged with the Court 17 for in camera review and served on all parties. Proposed redacted versions of these documents 18 are attached as Exhibits 1 and 2 respectively to the Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of this 19 motion. 20 DATED: March 5, 2012 21 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 22 23 24 25 26 27 By /s/ Victoria Maroulis Charles K. Verhoeven Kevin P.B. Johnson Victoria F. Maroulis Michael T. Zeller Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?