Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 796

Declaration of Marc J. Pernick in Support of #795 MOTION for Sanctions Apple's Rule 37(b)(2) Motion Based on Samsung's Violation of the Court's December 22, 2011 Order Regarding Source Code filed byApple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Related document(s) #795 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 3/9/2012)

Exhibit F

From:

Pernick, Marc J.

Sent:

Monday, February 27, 2012 11:32 AM

To:

'Bill Trac'

Cc:

Mark Tung; Rachel Herrick Kassabian; AppleMoFo; 'WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service'

Subject:

RE: Apple v. Samsung: Correspondence re: Production of Source Code by Samsung

Attachments: AvSS___Source_Code_Stip_Version (clean).doc
Hi Bill:
I've attached a Word version of Apple's draft stipulation.
Regards,
Marc

From: Bill Trac [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:38 AM
To: Pernick, Marc J.
Cc: Mark Tung; Rachel Herrick Kassabian
Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Correspondence re: Production of Source Code by Samsung

Hi Marc,
As a courtesy, may we please have an editable word version of Apple’s proposed stipulation?
Thanks,
Bill

Bill Trac
Associate,

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-801-5094 Direct
650.801.5000 Main Office Number
650.801.5100 FAX
[e-mail]
www.quinnemanuel.com
NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.

From: Pernick, Marc J. [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 9:47 PM
To: Rachel Herrick Kassabian
Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
Mazza, Mia; [e-mail]

Subject: Apple v. Samsung: Correspondence re: Production of Source Code by Samsung

<<2012--2-26 Pernick to Kassabian re Stipulaton on Source Code.pdf>> <<2012-02-26 Pernick to Kassabian re
Stipulation on Source Code.pdf>>
Hi Rachel,
Attached please find correspondence regarding Samsung's production of source code in response to the Court's
December 22, 2011 Order, as well as a draft stipulation for your review.

Regards,
Marc Pernick
Morrison & Foerster LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
650.813.5718
[e-mail]

--------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that,
if any advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including
any attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
(i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
For information about this legend, go to
http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee
(or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or
any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No.
170151)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC

11
12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

18
19
20

Plaintiff,
v.

23

JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SOURCE CODE
FOR THE ACCUSED DEVICES

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

24

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK

Defendants.

21
22

25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SOURCE CODE FOR ACCUSED DEVICES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
pa-1514264

1
2

WHEREAS, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) commenced the above-captioned action against

3

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung

4

Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung,” and together with Apple, “the

5

Parties” and individually each a “Party”) on April 15, 2011;

6

WHEREAS, through Requests for Production propounded on Samsung and other

7

discovery mechanisms, Apple sought production of the source code for the accused products (see,

8

e.g., Apple RFP Nos. 224, 228, and 232);

9

WHEREAS, on December 8, 2011, Apple filed a motion to compel seeking an order

10

directing Samsung to produce its source code for the accused products, including its source code

11

relating to certain specified accused functions (see Apple’s 12/8/11 [Proposed] Order Granting

12

Apple’s Mot. Compel Production of Docs. & Things at 2-3);

13

WHEREAS, on December 22, 2011, the Court issued an order requiring Samsung to

14

produce “the source code and technical documents requested by Apple’s motion” by

15

December 31, 2011 (12/22/11 Order at 2);

16
17
18

WHEREAS, Samsung produced only one version of source code for each accused product
by December 31, 2011;
WHEREAS, Apple contends that Samsung should be precluded from arguing that any

19

version of an accused product does not infringe any Apple patent-in-suit, unless the source code

20

for that version of the product either (i) was produced by December 31, 2011, or (ii) differs in no

21

material way from the source code for the version of the product that was produced by

22

December 31, 2011;

23

WHEREAS, although Samsung does not agree with Apple’s contention, Samsung

24

represents that, for purposes of assessing infringement of all but one of the Apple patents-in-suit,

25

the version of the following accused products for which Samsung did produce source code by

26

December 31, 2011 is representative of all versions of that product:

27
28

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)

Captivate;
Continuum;
Epic 4G;
Exhibit 4G;
Fascinate;

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SOURCE CODE FOR ACCUSED DEVICES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
pa- 1514264

1

1

11

(f) Galaxy Ace Showcase;
(g) Galaxy S 4G;
(h) Gravity Smart;
(i) Indulge;
(j) Intercept;
(k) Mesmerize;
(l) Nexus;
(m) Nexus S;
(n) Nexus S 4G;
(o) Replenish;
(p) Showcase Galaxy S;
(q) Sidekick;
(r) Transform;
(s) Vibrant;
(t) Galaxy Tab (AT&T, Sprint, TMobile and Verizon versions);
(u) ….
(v) …..
(w) …
(x) …...

12

WHEREAS, Samsung’s representation does not apply to Apple’s allegation that

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

13
14

Samsung’s accused products infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that it is in their mutual interest to memorialize

15

their partial resolution of this outstanding dispute regarding the consequences of Samsung’s

16

failure to produce all of the source code covered by the Court’s December 22, 2011 Order by

17

December 31, 2011.

18

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties as

19

follows:

20

1.

For purposes of assessing infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,493,002, 7,853,891,

21

7,864,163, 7,844,915, 7,812,828, 7,663,607, and 7,920,129 (whether direct or indirect, and

22

whether literal or by equivalents), the version of source code that Samsung produced by

23

December 31, 2011 for the following products is representative of the source code for all versions

24

of that product:

25
26
27
28

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.

Captivate;
Continuum;
Epic 4G;
Exhibit 4G;
Fascinate;
Galaxy Ace Showcase;
Galaxy S 4G;
Gravity Smart;
Indulge;

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SOURCE CODE FOR ACCUSED DEVICES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
pa- 1514264

2

1
j.
k.
l.
m.
n.
o.
p.
q.
r.
s.
t.
u.
v.
w.
x.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

2.

Intercept;
Mesmerize;
Nexus;
Nexus S;
Nexus S 4G;
Replenish;
Showcase Galaxy S;
Sidekick;
Transform;
Vibrant; and
Galaxy Tab (AT&T, Sprint, TMobile and Verizon versions);
…….
…….
…….
…….

This stipulation is without prejudice to Apple’s right to seek any remedy or relief

11

with regard to any disputes over Samsung’s production of source code in accordance with the

12

December 22, 2011 Order that are not addressed in Section 1 of this Stipulation.

13
14

Dated: February ___, 2012

15

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

By:_____________________________
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
ALISON M. TUCHER
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
JASON R. BARTLETT

By:________________________________
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.

24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SOURCE CODE FOR ACCUSED DEVICES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
pa- 1514264

3

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

Dated: ___________________, 2012

By:
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SOURCE CODE FOR ACCUSED DEVICES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
pa- 1514264

4