Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 81

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Connection with Motion for A Preliminary Injunction filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 7/1/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KENNETH H. BRIDGES (CA SBN 243541)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL T. PIEJA (CA SBN 250351)
[e-mail]
BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP
3000 El Camino Real
One Palo Alto Square, 2nd Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
15

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK

APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE
LIMIT
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3014157

1
2

In accordance with Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-11, Apple moves
the Court for leave to exceed the page limit for its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

3

Because a substantial portion of Apple’s brief is devoted to Samsung’s infringement of its

4

design patents, Apple has included images of figures from Apple’s patents, Apple’s products, and

5

the accused Samsung products. These comprise approximately nine pages of the brief. The size

6

and dimensions of these images has caused Apple to exceed the page limit set in Civil L.R. 7-2(b)

7

by approximately five pages. Because the additional length of the brief is largely attributable to

8

use of images rather than an excess of text, Apple requests leave to exceed the 25-page limit for

9

opening briefs.

10

Counsel for Samsung was unavailable to meet and confer prior to the filing of this motion,

11

so Apple was not able to obtain a stipulation regarding expansion of this page limit. (Declaration

12

of Richard S.J. Hung Regarding Meet and Confer Obligations relating to Apple Inc.’s Motions

13

Filed on July 1, 2011, filed herewith, ¶¶ 2-3, 5.)

14
15

Dated:

July 1, 2011

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

16
By:

17
18

/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs

Attorney for Plaintiff APPLE INC.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01846-LHK

sf-3014157

1

1

I, JASON R. BARTLETT, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to

2

file the following document: APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE

3

LIMIT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael A. Jacobs has

4

concurred in this filing.

5
6

Dated: July 1, 2011

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By: /s/ Jason R. Bartlett
JASON R. BARTLETT

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01846-LHK

sf-3014157

1