Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 815

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel, #2 Declaration of S. Calvin Walden in Support of Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit 11, #14 Exhibit 12, #15 Exhibit 13, #16 Exhibit 14, #17 [Proposed] Order Granting Apple's Motion to Compel)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 3/15/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 11 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Walden, S. Calvin Friday, March 09, 2012 4:59 PM 'Rachel Herrick Kassabian'; Kolovos, Peter; Samsung v. Apple 'AppleMoFo'; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service RE: Apple v Samsung (ND Cal) -- Discovery Correspondence Rachel,    When you declined to do a meet‐and‐confer on Tuesday or Wednesday concerning prior letter we sent, and said you  were sending written responses instead, I assumed we would be getting those responses promptly.  When will receive  that letter.  I have tried calling you today, and am available still to discuss.  Regardless of whether you plan to send a  letter or not, given the passage of time and the fact that today is the day after the close of fact discovery, when can you  do a meet‐and‐confer?   If later today or this weekend works for you, we'll make it work as well.  Please let me know a  time that works and we'll set it up.    Thanks,    Calvin    From: Rachel Herrick Kassabian [mailto:rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 2:21 PM To: Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter; Samsung v. Apple Cc: 'AppleMoFo'; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service Subject: RE: Apple v Samsung (ND Cal) -- Discovery Correspondence   Hi Calvin,  We are preparing written responses to your letters and can discuss a telephonic meet and confer thereafter.  Regards,  Rachel    From: Walden, S. Calvin [mailto:Calvin.Walden@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:02 AM To: Walden, S. Calvin; Kolovos, Peter; Rachel Herrick Kassabian; Samsung v. Apple Cc: AppleMoFo; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service Subject: RE: Apple v Samsung (ND Cal) -- Discovery Correspondence   Rachel,     Following from my e‐mails last night, are you or someone from your team available for a teleconference at 10:30am?  If  not, what time(s) work for you today?    Thanks,    Calvin    From: Walden, S. Calvin Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:51 AM To: Kolovos, Peter; Rachel Herrick Kassabian; Samsung v. Apple Cc: AppleMoFo; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service Subject: RE: Apple v Samsung (ND Cal) -- Discovery Correspondence 1   Rachel,    We have also not received a response to the attached letters sent on February 28 regarding Samsung's document  production and offers to meet‐and‐confer on Apple's 11'th and 12th sets of RFP's.  Would you or someone from your  team be available tomorrow at 10:30am Pacific to discuss?      Thanks,    Calvin    From: Kolovos, Peter Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:23 PM To: Rachel Herrick Kassabian; Samsung v. Apple Cc: AppleMoFo; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service Subject: Apple v Samsung (ND Cal) -- Discovery Correspondence   Rachel ‐‐ please see the attached letter from Calvin Walden.        Peter J. Kolovos | WilmerHale  60 State Street  Boston, MA 02109 USA  +1 617 526 6493 (t)  +1 617 526 5000 (f)  peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com    Please consider the environment before printing this email.  This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not  the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to postmaster@wilmerhale.com—and destroy all  copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.    For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at http://www.wilmerhale.com.   2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?