Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 820

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #801 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #801 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 3/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 10 11 12 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) pa-1518354 1 I, Cyndi Wheeler, declare as follows: 2 1. I am an attorney for Apple Inc. (“Apple”). I submit this declaration in support of 3 Samsung’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal filed on March 13, 2012. [Dkt. No. 801.] 4 Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below. If called as 5 a witness I could and would testify competently as follows. 6 2. Exhibits 1, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 of the Declaration of Christopher E. Price (“Price 7 Declaration”) in Support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Rule 37(b)(2) Motion re 8 Samsung’s Violation of January 27, 2012 Damages Discovery Order (“Samsung’s Opposition”) 9 contain Apple-confidential material. (See Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of Samsung’s 10 11 Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Dkt. No. 801-1].) Specifically: • Exhibit 1 to the Price Declaration consists of Apple’s highly confidential Gross 12 Margin Reports, which identify material costs, management costs, marketing 13 costs, and gross margins for Apple‘s iPhone products, as well as reports of 14 Apple earnings from search engines on the iPhone, and should be sealed in its 15 entirety. 16 • Exhibits 3 and 4 to the Price Declaration are charts showing the royalties 17 Apple has paid to licensors in relation to its iPhone, iPad, and iPod products, 18 which is highly confidential information. Both exhibits should be sealed in 19 their entirety. 20 • Exhibit 7 to the Price Declaration is a document entitled “iPhone Units by 21 Channel/Carrier/Reseller.” The document contains highly confidential sales 22 information on a per-unit basis broken down by the carrier, channel, and 23 reseller of Apple‘s products, and should be sealed in its entirety. 24 • Exhibit 9 to the Price Declaration contains a reference to the number of 25 physical design models Apple possesses, internal Apple code names for its 26 products, and discussions of specific documents relating to baseband 27 processors and custodians of those documents. A proposed redacted version is 28 attached as Exhibit 1. DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) pa-1518354 1 • 1 Exhibit 10 to the Price Declaration consists of reports of Apple earnings from 2 search engines on the iPhone, which are highly confidential. Exhibit 10 should 3 be sealed in its entirety. • 4 5 6 Samsung’s Opposition contains discussion of the aforementioned exhibits and should be sealed to the extent it refers to them. 3. It is Apple’s policy not to disclose or describe its confidential financial 7 information, design and product development information, trade secrets, or business practices to 8 third parties. The above information is confidential to Apple. It is indicative of the way that 9 Apple manages its business affairs, designs its products and conducts product development. 10 Apple’s internal Apple code names reveal information that Apple uses to maintain confidentiality 11 with respect to its entire design and development process. If disclosed, the information in the 12 materials described above could be used by Apple’s competitors to Apple’s disadvantage. The 13 requested relief is necessary and narrowly tailored to protect the confidentiality of this 14 information. 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed this 20th day of March, 2012 at Cupertino, California. 17 18 /s/ Cyndi Wheeler ___________ Cyndi Wheeler 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) pa-1518354 2 1 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 2 I, Richard S.J. Hung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Cyndi Wheeler has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 Dated: March 20, 2012 6 /s/ Richard S.J. Hung Richard S.J. Hung 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) pa-1518354 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?