Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
820
Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #801 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #801 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 3/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
10
11
12
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
DECLARATION OF
CYNDI WHEELER IN SUPPORT
OF SAMSUNG’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER
SEAL
Defendants.
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
pa-1518354
1
I, Cyndi Wheeler, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am an attorney for Apple Inc. (“Apple”). I submit this declaration in support of
3
Samsung’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal filed on March 13, 2012. [Dkt. No. 801.]
4
Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below. If called as
5
a witness I could and would testify competently as follows.
6
2.
Exhibits 1, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 of the Declaration of Christopher E. Price (“Price
7
Declaration”) in Support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Rule 37(b)(2) Motion re
8
Samsung’s Violation of January 27, 2012 Damages Discovery Order (“Samsung’s Opposition”)
9
contain Apple-confidential material. (See Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of Samsung’s
10
11
Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Dkt. No. 801-1].) Specifically:
•
Exhibit 1 to the Price Declaration consists of Apple’s highly confidential Gross
12
Margin Reports, which identify material costs, management costs, marketing
13
costs, and gross margins for Apple‘s iPhone products, as well as reports of
14
Apple earnings from search engines on the iPhone, and should be sealed in its
15
entirety.
16
•
Exhibits 3 and 4 to the Price Declaration are charts showing the royalties
17
Apple has paid to licensors in relation to its iPhone, iPad, and iPod products,
18
which is highly confidential information. Both exhibits should be sealed in
19
their entirety.
20
•
Exhibit 7 to the Price Declaration is a document entitled “iPhone Units by
21
Channel/Carrier/Reseller.” The document contains highly confidential sales
22
information on a per-unit basis broken down by the carrier, channel, and
23
reseller of Apple‘s products, and should be sealed in its entirety.
24
•
Exhibit 9 to the Price Declaration contains a reference to the number of
25
physical design models Apple possesses, internal Apple code names for its
26
products, and discussions of specific documents relating to baseband
27
processors and custodians of those documents. A proposed redacted version is
28
attached as Exhibit 1.
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
pa-1518354
1
•
1
Exhibit 10 to the Price Declaration consists of reports of Apple earnings from
2
search engines on the iPhone, which are highly confidential. Exhibit 10 should
3
be sealed in its entirety.
•
4
5
6
Samsung’s Opposition contains discussion of the aforementioned exhibits and
should be sealed to the extent it refers to them.
3.
It is Apple’s policy not to disclose or describe its confidential financial
7
information, design and product development information, trade secrets, or business practices to
8
third parties. The above information is confidential to Apple. It is indicative of the way that
9
Apple manages its business affairs, designs its products and conducts product development.
10
Apple’s internal Apple code names reveal information that Apple uses to maintain confidentiality
11
with respect to its entire design and development process. If disclosed, the information in the
12
materials described above could be used by Apple’s competitors to Apple’s disadvantage. The
13
requested relief is necessary and narrowly tailored to protect the confidentiality of this
14
information.
15
16
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
declaration was executed this 20th day of March, 2012 at Cupertino, California.
17
18
/s/ Cyndi Wheeler ___________
Cyndi Wheeler
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
pa-1518354
2
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
I, Richard S.J. Hung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Cyndi Wheeler has
4
concurred in this filing.
5
Dated: March 20, 2012
6
/s/ Richard S.J. Hung
Richard S.J. Hung
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
pa-1518354
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?