Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
825
OPPOSITION to ( #782 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Motion Compel Production Materials From Related Proceedings and to Enforce 12/22/11 Court Order ) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Nathan Sabri Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 3/21/2012) Modified text on 3/22/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
MATERIALS FROM RELATED
PROCEEDINGS AND TO
ENFORCE DECEMBER 22, 2011
COURT ORDER
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MTC PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS FROM RELATED PROCEEDINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3122614
1
Defendants seek an order directing Apple to produce all deposition transcripts from Apple
2
employees and “other materials” from cases bearing a technological nexus to this action and
3
allowing Samsung to serve additional written discovery. Having considered the arguments of the
4
parties and the papers submitted, Samsung’s Motion to Compel is DENIED.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: April _____, 2012.
7
8
9
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MTC PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS FROM RELATED PROCEEDINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3122614
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?