Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 83

MOTION to Expedite Trial and Case Management Conference filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 7/1/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KENNETH H. BRIDGES (CA SBN 243541)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL T. PIEJA (CA SBN 250351)
[e-mail]
BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP
3000 El Camino Real
One Palo Alto Square, 2nd Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Case No.

5:11-cv-01846-LHK

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE INC.’S MOTION FOR
EXPEDITED TRIAL ON ITS
CLAIMS AND FOR EARLY CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED TRIAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3014077

1

Having considered all of the papers filed in connection with Plaintiff’s Motion for

2

Expedited Trial on its Claims and for Early Case Management Conference, as well as the

3

arguments presented by the parties at the hearing on this motion, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:

4

Plaintiff’s Motion for Expedited Trial is hereby GRANTED.

5

The following case schedule is entered as to Apple’s claims in this case.

6
7

Date

Event

July 25, 2011

Case Management Conference.

Aug. 4, 2011

Apple serves infringement contentions and produces required
documents (Patent L.R. 3-1, 3-2). Apple proposes claim terms for
construction (Patent L.R. 4-1).

Sept. 2, 2011

Samsung serves invalidity contentions and produces required
documents (Patent L.R. 3-3, 3-4). Samsung proposes claim terms
for construction (Patent L.R. 4-1).

Sept. 9, 2011

Parties exchange preliminary claim constructions and identify
supporting evidence and experts (Patent L.R. 4-2).

Sept. 16, 2011

Parties file Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement,
limited to ten total terms in dispute (Patent L.R. 4-3).

16

Oct. 7, 2011

Close of claim construction discovery

17

Oct. 13, 2011

Apple’s Opening Claim Construction Brief

18

Oct. 27, 2011

Samsung’s Claim Construction Opposition

19

Nov. 3, 2011

Apple’s Claim Construction Reply

20

Nov. 17, 2011

Claim Construction Hearing

Dec. 2, 2011

Fact discovery cut-off and initial expert disclosures/reports

Dec. 16, 2011

Rebuttal expert reports

Dec. 29, 2011

Close of expert discovery

Jan. 25, 2012

Final pretrial conference

Feb. 1, 2012

Jury trial begins on Apple’s claims

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED TRIAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3014077

1

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated:

4
5

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED TRIAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3014077

2