Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 859

Declaration of Erica Tierney in Support of #847 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed byApple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) #847 ) (Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 4/9/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT P1 FILED UNDER SEAL HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY - CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION Page 1 1 2 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 3 4 5 6 7 8 -------------------------------x In the Matter of: ) ) CERTAIN ELECTRONIC ) Investigation No. DEVICES, INCLUDING WIRELESS ) COMMUNICATION DEVICES, ) 337-TA-794 PORTABLE MUSIC AND DATA ) PROCESSING DEVICES, AND TABLET ) COMPUTERS ) -------------------------------x 9 10 11 12 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 13 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BORIS TEKSLER 14 San Mateo, California 15 Friday, February 24, 2012 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Reported By: SUSAN A. SULLIVAN, CSR #3522, RPR, CRR JOB NO. 46739 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY - CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION Page 14 1 Page 15 1 Page 16 1 Page 17 1 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 5 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY - CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION Page 154 Page 155 1 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q The third paragraph -- sorry, it is not the third paragraph. The paragraph about the third element which is "No Injunction" states, "A party who made a FRAND commitment to license its cellular standard essential patents or otherwise acquired assets/rights from a party who made the FRAND commitment must not seek injunctive relief on such patents. Seeking an injunction would be a violation of the party's commitment to FRAND licensing." Do you see that? A I do. Q In your experience is that a view that's universally shared by other ETSI members? MR. SELWYN: Objection as to form. Page 156 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE WITNESS: Again, I think that it varies and I'm not sure what other people think necessarily. MR. SHIELDS: All right. Q Well, you said it varies. Have you heard different ETSI members express different views about the availability of injunctive relief? MR. SELWYN: Objection to the form. THE WITNESS: I've heard a single ETSI member express multiple views on the topic. Q BY MR. SHIELDS: Okay. Have you yourself -A Or contrary views, maybe I should say that. Q Have you yourself observed any ETSI members seeking injunctive relief on declared essential patents that were subject to a FRAND entity? A IPCom certainly is, Samsung is, Motorola is. Q Anyone else? A No. Q And I don't remember currently right now, I mean ever. A I don't know. Q Qualcomm sought injunctive relief on patents that were subject to an ETSI FRAND commitment? Page 157 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide A In which case are you referring to? Q Well, for example, against Nokia. A I believe they were -- you know, I'm not certain. Q Going back up to the third paragraph of this letter to the paragraph that starts "It is apparent" -A Yes. Q -- the first sentence which we talk about a little before, "It is apparent that our industry suffers from a lack of consistent adherence to FRAND principles in the cellular standards arena." What did Apple mean to convey to ETSI by that sentence? MR. SELWYN: Objection to form. Objection; outside the scope. THE WITNESS: I think that would probably be privileged. Q BY MR. SHIELDS: You mean you can't answer without revealing attorney-client communications? A That's right. MR. SHIELDS: All right. We need to change tape so why don't we take a break. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going off the record. The time is 3:13 p.m. Here marks the end of (877) 702-9580 40

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?