Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
859
Declaration of Erica Tierney in Support of #847 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed byApple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) #847 ) (Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 4/9/2012)
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT P1
FILED UNDER SEAL
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY - CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION
Page 1
1
2
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
3
4
5
6
7
8
-------------------------------x
In the Matter of:
)
)
CERTAIN ELECTRONIC
) Investigation No.
DEVICES, INCLUDING WIRELESS
)
COMMUNICATION DEVICES,
) 337-TA-794
PORTABLE MUSIC AND DATA
)
PROCESSING DEVICES, AND TABLET )
COMPUTERS
)
-------------------------------x
9
10
11
12
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION
13
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BORIS TEKSLER
14
San Mateo, California
15
Friday, February 24, 2012
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Reported By:
SUSAN A. SULLIVAN, CSR #3522, RPR, CRR
JOB NO. 46739
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
(877) 702-9580
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY - CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION
Page 14
1
Page 15
1
Page 16
1
Page 17
1
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
(877) 702-9580
5
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY - CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION
Page 154
Page 155
1
1
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q The third paragraph -- sorry, it is not the
third paragraph.
The paragraph about the third element which
is "No Injunction" states, "A party who made a FRAND
commitment to license its cellular standard
essential patents or otherwise acquired
assets/rights from a party who made the FRAND
commitment must not seek injunctive relief on such
patents. Seeking an injunction would be a violation
of the party's commitment to FRAND licensing."
Do you see that?
A I do.
Q In your experience is that a view that's
universally shared by other ETSI members?
MR. SELWYN: Objection as to form.
Page 156
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
THE WITNESS: Again, I think that it varies and
I'm not sure what other people think necessarily.
MR. SHIELDS: All right.
Q Well, you said it varies. Have you heard
different ETSI members express different views about
the availability of injunctive relief?
MR. SELWYN: Objection to the form.
THE WITNESS: I've heard a single ETSI member
express multiple views on the topic.
Q BY MR. SHIELDS: Okay. Have you
yourself -A Or contrary views, maybe I should say that.
Q Have you yourself observed any ETSI members
seeking injunctive relief on declared essential
patents that were subject to a FRAND entity?
A IPCom certainly is, Samsung is, Motorola
is.
Q Anyone else?
A No.
Q And I don't remember currently right now, I
mean ever.
A I don't know.
Q Qualcomm sought injunctive relief on
patents that were subject to an ETSI FRAND
commitment?
Page 157
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
TSG Reporting - Worldwide
A In which case are you referring to?
Q Well, for example, against Nokia.
A I believe they were -- you know, I'm not
certain.
Q Going back up to the third paragraph of
this letter to the paragraph that starts "It is
apparent" -A Yes.
Q -- the first sentence which we talk about a
little before, "It is apparent that our industry
suffers from a lack of consistent adherence to FRAND
principles in the cellular standards arena."
What did Apple mean to convey to ETSI by
that sentence?
MR. SELWYN: Objection to form. Objection;
outside the scope.
THE WITNESS: I think that would probably be
privileged.
Q BY MR. SHIELDS: You mean you can't answer
without revealing attorney-client communications?
A That's right.
MR. SHIELDS: All right. We need to change tape
so why don't we take a break.
THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going off the record.
The time is 3:13 p.m. Here marks the end of
(877) 702-9580
40
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?