Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
892
OPPOSITION to ( #885 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION For Clarification Of April 12 Order ) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 4/30/2012) Modified text on 5/1/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
EXHIBIT J
quinn emanuel
trial lawyers | los angeles
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 | TEL: (213) 443-3000 FAX: (213) 443-3100
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NO.
(213) 443-3666
WRITER'S INTERNET ADDRESS
dianehutnyan@quinnemanuel.com
March 23, 2012
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Jason Bartlett, Esq.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
Re:
Apple v. Samsung Elecs. Co. et al., Case No. 11-cv-1846 LHK (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Jason,
Following on my letters of February 23 and March 3, I write to update Apple further on
Samsung's efforts to obtain approval from certain third parties for Apple to produce materials
from related actions that purportedly contain the confidential business information of those third
parties.
Nokia consents to a limited disclosure of documents Nokia v. Apple, 09-cv-00791 (D. Del.), the
subject matter of which bear a technological nexus to the instant litigation as it involves the ’381
patent. Nokia's consent is predicated on the condition that all such documents are for use
exclusively in the ongoing litigation between Samsung and Apple. Please see the attached email
for details, which explicitly sets out the scope of Nokia’s consent, including which documents
are released.
In regard to these materials from related actions that contain the confidential business
information of third parties, Apple represented on February 10 that “[o]nce Samsung obtains this
consent, Apple will promptly produce such documents.” Obviously, that was false, but we urge
Apple again to produce all responsive documents without further delay.
quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp
NEW YORK | 51
Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10010-1601 | TEL (212) 849-7000 FAX (212) 849-7100
California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4788 | TEL (415) 875-6600 FAX (415) 875-6700
SILICON VALLEY | 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 | TEL (650) 801-5000 FAX (650) 801-5100
CHICAGO | 500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510 | TEL (312) 705-7400 FAX (312) 705-7401
SAN FRANCISCO | 50
WASHINGTON, DC | 1299
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 825, Washington, District of Columbia 20004-2400 | TEL (202) 538-8000 FAX (202) 538-8100
Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EG, United Kingdom | TEL +44(0) 20 7653 2000 FAX +44(0) 20 7653 2100
TOKYO | NBF Hibiya Building, 25F, 1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan | TEL +81 3 5510 1711 FAX +81 3 5510 1712
MANNHEIM | Erzbergerstraße 5, 68165 Mannheim, Germany | TEL +49(0) 621 43298 6000 FAX +49(0) 621 43298 6100
LONDON | 16
MOSCOW | Voentorg
Building, 3rd Floor, 10 Vozdvizhenka Street, Moscow 125009, Russia | TEL +7 495 797 3666
FAX +7
495 797 3667
Kind regards,
/s/ Diane C. Hutnyan
Diane C. Hutnyan
Enclosure
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?