Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 952

MOTION to Shorten Time Apples Inc.s Motion To Shorten Time For Briefing On Apple Inc.s Motion Pursuant To Rule 62(C) For Entry Of Preliminary Injunction Without Further Hearing filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Mia Mazza In Support Of Apple Inc.s Motion To Shorten Time For Briefing On Its Motion Pursuant To Rule 62(C) For Entry Of Preliminary Injunction Without Further Hearing, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Apples Motion To Shorten Time For Briefing On APPLE Inc.s Motion Pursuant To Rule 62(C) For Entry Of Preliminary Injunction Without Further Hearing)(McElhinny, Harold) (Filed on 5/18/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOT. TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3147911

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME FOR BRIEFING ON APPLE
INC.’S MOTION PURSUANT TO
RULE 62(C) FOR ENTRY OF
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WITHOUT FURTHER HEARING

1

Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-3 for

2

an order shortening the briefing schedule for Apple’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 62(c) for Entry of

3

Preliminary Injunction Without Further Hearing (“Rule 62(c) Motion”).

4

Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and good cause

5

having been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing,

6

and sets the following briefing schedule for Apple’s Rule 62(c) Motion:

7

1)

8
9

Samsung’s opposition to Apple’s Rule 62(c) Motion shall be filed on or before
May 25, 2012;

2)

Apple’s reply shall be filed on or before May 30, 2012

10

No hearing shall be held.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

Dated: __________________, 2012.

13
14

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOT. TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3147911

1