Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 96

OPPOSITION to ( #84 MOTION to Shorten Time for Briefing on Apple's Motion for Expedited Trial and Case Managment Conference ) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Shorten Time)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/5/2011) Modified text on 7/12/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and
14 Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

19
20

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
21 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
22 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
23 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

Defendants.

25
26
27
28

02198.51855/4233727.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Having considered Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing and

3 Hearing on Apple’s Motion for Expedited Trial on Its Claims and for Early Case Management
4 Conference (the “Motion”) (D.N. 84), the declaration cited therein, and all pleadings and other
5 papers in support thereof; and the Opposition filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
6 Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively
7 “Samsung”), the declaration cited therein, and all pleadings and other papers in support thereof;
8 the Court concludes that good cause does not exist for Apple’s Motion. The Court therefore
9 DENIES Apple’s Motion.
10

Apple’s Motion for Expedited Trial on Its Claims and for Early Case Management

11 Conference (D.N. 83) shall be briefed according to the normal schedule prescribed by the Civil
12 Local Rules of this Court, as follows:
13

•

Samsung’s Opposition to the Motion will be due on or before July 15, 2011; and

14

•

Apple’s Reply in support of the Motion, if any, will be due on or before July 22, 2011;

15

In order to avoid undue burden on Samsung, representatives of whom must travel from

16 South Korea, the hearing on Apple’s Motion, if any, shall be held on the same day as the
17 currently-scheduled Case Management Conference in this action, or August 24, 2011, at 2 p.m.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21 DATED: _________ , 2011

______________________________________

22

LUCY H. KOH

23

United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28

02198.51855/4233727.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

-1-