Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 97

Declaration of Erik Olson in Support of #96 Opposition/Response to Motion, (Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Shorten Time) filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #96 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/5/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and
14 Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

19
20

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF ERIK OLSON IN
SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION
TO APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
21 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
22 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
23 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4233811.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF ERIK OLSON IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

1

I, Erik Olson, hereby declare as follows:

2

1.

I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,

3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
4 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I have personal knowledge of the
5 facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such
6 facts under oath.
7

2.

Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the

8 Transcript of Proceedings held before the Court in this case on May 12, 2011.
9

3.

On July 22, 2011, lead trial counsel for Samsung, Charles K. Verhoeven, is

10 scheduled to appear at a Markman hearing in Wisconsin before Judge Barbara B. Crabb in Apple
11 Inc. et al. v. Motorola, Inc. et al., No. 10-cv-662-bbc (W.D. Wisc.). Mr. Verhoeven thus will be in
12 Wisconsin on July 21 in anticipation of that hearing. Judge Crabb scheduled the Markman
13 hearing in December of 2010. The case involves 21 asserted patents, 60 asserted claims, and 12
14 disputed claim terms.
15

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July

16 5, 2011 in San Francisco, California.
17
18

/s/ Erik Olson
Erik Olson

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4233811.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1DECLARATION OF ERIK OLSON IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME