Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
994
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Second Supplemental Price Declaration in Support of (Dkt No. 934) Samsung's Motion to Strike filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Price Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal, #3 Second Supplemental Price Declaration, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/31/2012) Modified on 6/3/2012 attachment #1 Sealed pursuant to General Order No. 62 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
12
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
13 Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
14 SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA LLC, a Delaware limited liability
15 company,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
1
In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Samsung
2 Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications
3 America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) has moved for an order to seal the following documents:
4
The confidential, unredacted version of the Second Supplemental Declaration of
5
Christopher E. Price in Support of Samsung's Motion to Strike Expert Reports, and
6
Exhibits A-E thereto.
7
Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and GOOD
8 CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Samsung’s Motion to File Under
9 Seal.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12 Dated: June __, 2012
13
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?