Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 996

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Cyndi Wheeler In Support Of Apples Administrative Motion To File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony, #2 Declaration Of Mia Mazza In Support Of Apples Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony, #3 [Proposed] Order Granting Apples Administrative Motion To File Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike, #4 Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony Based On Undisclosed Facts And Theories, #5 Declaration Of Marc J. Pernick In Support Of Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony Based On Undisclosed Facts And Theories, #6 Exhibit Pernick Decl. Ex. 8, #7 Exhibit Pernick Decl. Ex. 10, #8 Exhibit Pernick Decl. Ex. 11, #9 Exhibit Pernick Decl. Ex. 12, #10 Exhibit Pernick Decl. Ex. 16, #11 Exhibit Pernick Decl. Ex. 17, #12 Exhibit Pernick Decl. Ex. 19, #13 Declaration Of Michel Maharbiz, Ph.D. In Support Of Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony, #14 Exhibit Maharbiz Decl. Ex. A, #15 Exhibit Maharbiz Decl. Ex. B, #16 [Proposed] Order Denying Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 936))(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 5/31/2012) Modified on 6/3/2012 pursuant to General Order No. 62, attachment #1 and #2 Sealed (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

13
Plaintiff,
14
v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE
EXPERT TESTIMONY (DKT. NO. 936)

15
16
17
18
19

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

June 26, 2012
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
Hon. Paul S. Grewal

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3150825

1

The Court having considered the supporting and opposing papers submitted in connection

2

with Samsung’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 936), as well as the arguments

3

made by counsel at the June 26, 2012 hearing, and GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

5

Samsung’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 936) is DENIED.

6
7
8

Dated: _____________
Honorable Paul S. Grewal

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3150825

1