Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
997
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Document Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Order Granting Apples Administrative Motion To File Document Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #2 Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #3 [Proposed] Order Denying Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 930-1))(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (DKT. NO. 930-1)
15
16
17
18
19
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
June 21, 2012
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3150826
1
The Court having considered the supporting and opposing papers submitted in connection
2
with Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 930-1), as well as the arguments made
3
by counsel at the June 21, 2012 hearing, and GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 930-1) is DENIED.
6
7
8
Dated: _____________
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3150826
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?