Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 49

MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by John Chambers, Owen Chan, Cisco Systems, Inc., Thomas Lam. Motion Hearing set for 12/16/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Responses due by 10/12/2011. Replies due by 11/14/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sullivan, Kathleen) (Filed on 8/4/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Kathleen M. Sullivan (CA Bar No. 242261)
[e-mail]
2
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
3 Redwood City, California 94065
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
4
Faith E. Gay (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Isaac Nesser (pro hac vice)
6
[e-mail]
7 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
[phone]
8 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
9
Attorneys for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc.,
10 John Chambers, Thomas Lam, and Owen Chan
5

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13

14 Doe I, Doe II, Ivy He, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V,
Doe VI, Roe VII, Charles Lee, Roe VIII, Liu
15 Guifu, and those individuals similarly situated,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs,

16
17

Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF

v.

18 Cisco Systems, Inc., John Chambers, Thomas
Lam, Owen Chan, and Does 1-100,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:11-cv-2449-JF
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

1

Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., John Chambers, Thomas Lam, and Owen Chan have

2 moved the Court, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) for an order
3 dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint in its entirety.
4

Having considered all the papers filed by the parties in connection with Defendants’

5 Motion to Dismiss, the parties’ arguments at the hearing on this matter, and other materials of
6 which the Court may properly take judicial notice, and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS
7 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the Complaint in its
8 entirety as against all Defendants.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11 DATED:
12
13
14

United States District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:11-cv-2449-JF
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS