Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
62
ERRATA to 61 First Amended Complaint by Doe I, Doe II, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, Doe VI, Liu Guifu, Ivy He, Charles Lee, Roe VII, Roe VIII. (Attachments: # 1 Corrected First Amended Complaint)(Boyd, Kathryn) (Filed on 9/2/2011) Modified on 9/7/2011 (gm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KATHRYN LEE CRAWFORD-BOYD, ESQ. (SBN 189496)
lboyd@srbr-law.com
RAJIKA L. SHAH, ESQ. (SBN 232994)
rshah@srbr-law.com
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 360
Los Angeles, California 90048
Phone: (323) 302-9488, Fax: (323) 931-4990
TERRI MARSH, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
terri.marsh@hrlf.net
BRIAN PIERCE, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
brianp@hrlf.net
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOUNDATION
1615 L Street NW, Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 369-4977, Fax: (323) 931-4990
12
JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY (pro hac vice pending)
jchomsky@igc.org
LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY
8210 New Second Street
Elkins Park, PA 19027
Phone: (215) 782-8327, Fax: (215)782-8368
13
Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS
10
11
14
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE
IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles
LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu, and
those individual similarly situated,
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSGx
Assigned to the Hon. Jeremy Fogel
NOTICE OF ERRATA RE: FIRST
AMENDED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT
vs.
21
22
23
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., John
CHAMBERS, Thomas LAM, Owen
CHAN, Fredy CHEUNG, and DOES 1100,
24
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
NOTICE OF ERRATA RE: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSGx
1
2
3
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF
RECORD:
Please take notice that counsel for Plaintiffs DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III,
4
DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu
5
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) inadvertently uploaded the incorrect file, containing an earlier
6
draft, when e-filing the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on September 2, 2011 (Docket
7
Entry 61). The correct file with the final version of the First Amended Complaint will be
8
uploaded hereafter and titled “Corrected First Amended Complaint.”
9
10
The three paragraphs where there are differences between the erroneously uploaded
document (FAC) and the correct document (Corrected FAC) are as follows:
11
FAC ¶ 147:
12
During their interrogation of Doe II, the police subjected her to severe mental and
13
physical abuse, so much so that she falsely confessed to crimes she subsequently denied at
14
her trial.
15
CORRECTED ¶ 147:
16
During the interrogation of Doe II, the police subjected her to severe mental and
17
physical abuse, so much so that she characterized as "criminal" acts that are perfectly
18
legal under Chinese and international law.
19
FAC ¶ 158:
20
At the police station, Public Security officers interrogated her continuously for
21
many hours in order to force her to falsely confess to crimes she believed she did not
22
commit. They poured ice-cold water over her naked body and forced her to stand in a
23
bucket of ice. She was also kicked, beaten, insulted and subjected continuously to other
24
forms public humiliation, and mental and physical torture.
25
CORRECTED ¶ 158:
26
At the police station, Public Security officers interrogated her continuously for
27
many hours in order to force her to characterize acts that are perfectly legal under
28
Chinese and international law as "crimes." They poured ice-cold water over her naked
1
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
NOTICE OF ERRATA RE: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSGx
1
body and forced her to stand in a bucket of ice. She was also kicked, beaten, insulted and
2
subjected continuously to other forms public humiliation, and mental and physical torture.
3
FAC ¶ 194:
4
The next day, Public Security officers took Doe VI to Weifang City detention
5
center. While at the detention center, he was subjected to continuous interrogation and
6
torture to force him to falsely confess to criminal conduct and to abandon the practice of
7
Falun Gong. He was not formally charged until almost a month later.
8
CORRECTED ¶ 194:
9
The next day, Public Security officers took Doe VI to Weifang City detention
10
center. While at the detention center, he was subjected to continuous interrogation and
11
other forms of torture to force him to characterize activities that are legal under Chinese
12
and international law as "crimes" and to abandon the practice of Falun Gong. He was not
13
formally charged until almost a month later.
14
15
DATED: September 2, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
16
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD &
RADER, LLP
17
18
19
20
21
22
By:
/s/ K. Lee Crawford-Boyd
K. Lee Crawford-Boyd, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Terri E. Marsh, Esq.
HUMAN RIGHTS LEGAL FOUNDATION
Attorney for Plaintiffs
23
24
25
26
Judith Brown Chomsky, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN
CHOMSKY
To be admitted pro hac vice
Attorney for Plaintiffs
27
28
2
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
NOTICE OF ERRATA RE: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF-PSGx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?