Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 83

MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by John Chambers, Owen Chan, Fredy Cheung, Cisco Systems, Inc., Thomas Lam. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sullivan, Kathleen) (Filed on 3/16/2012)

1

6

KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN (CA Bar No. 242261)
[e-mail]
FAITH E. GAY (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ISAAC NESSER (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

Attorneys for DEFENDANTS

2
3
4
5

8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE IV,
DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE,
ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu, and those
individual similarly situated,

12

15
16
17

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY

Plaintiffs,

13
14

Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx
Assigned to the Hon. Edward J. Davila

Action Filed: May 19, 2011
FAC Filed: Sept. 2, 2011

vs.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., John CHAMBERS,
Thomas LAM, Owen CHAN, Fredy
CHEUNG, and DOES 1-100,

Conference: March 23, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 1, 5th Floor

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Having considered Defendants’ Administrative Motion to Appear Telephonically at the

3

March 23, 2012 case management conference, and with good cause shown, the Court ORDERS

4

that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

Dated: March __, 2012

__________________________________________
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER ON MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx