In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
Filing
716
Omnibus Declaration of Christina J. Brown in Support of #715 Reply re Joint Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Edward E. Leamer, Ph.D. , #714 Reply to Joint Motion to Strike the Improper Rebuttal Testimony in Dr. Leamer's Reply Expert Report or, in the Alternative, MOTION for Leave to Submit a Reply Report of Dr. Stiroh filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q)(Related document(s) #715 , #714 ) (Brown, Christina) (Filed on 2/27/2014) Modified text on 2/28/2014 (dhmS, COURT STAFF).
EXHIBIT F
OMNIBUS BROWN DECLARATION
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject
Eric Schmidt on behalf of Eric Schmidt
Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:19 PM
Shona Brown; Arnnon Geshuri
FW: recruiting
can you review? 1thought Intel was on our ''no hire" list.. Eric
From: OteUini, Paul [mailto:paul.otellini@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:54PM
To: Eric Schmidt
Subject: recruiting
Hi Eric,
Sorry to bother you again on this topic, but my guys are very troubled by Google
continuing to recruit our key players.
Most recently, two very senior software employees have received an offer for Google that
is "one million dollars" in cash and restricted shares. They claim that they have turned
Google down 2-3 times, and that they were told the offers will remain in place should they
change their minds ... The offers are for Mountain View. They claim the recruiting was
unsolicited ..
Can you pis reinforce the no recruiting agreement? I would appreciate it. Thanks, paul
EXHIBIT 1.{5/
{)/e_( ( ,-;;-:
Deponent
Date
1
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
I ' 9t 1 ยท 1 ':?
Gina V. Carbone, CSR
GOOG-HIGH-TECH-D0058864
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?