MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
609
Declaration of Scott Schrader in Support of Renewed Motion to Stay the Case Pending Completion of Inter Partes Reexamination Pending Before the Patent and Trademark Office re 608 filed on behalf of Acer America Corp., Apple Inc., ASUS Computer International, Cyberli nk.com Corp., Dell, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Nero AG, Nero, Inc., Sonic Solutions, Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. filed byMicrosoft Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16) (Schrader, Scott) (Filed on 6/22/2011) Modified on 6/23/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/22/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Scott Schrader (State Bar No. 219673)
Covington & Burling LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 591‐6000
Facsimile: (415) 591‐6091
Email:
sschrader@cov.com
George F. Pappas (admitted pro hac vice)
Richard L. Rainey (admitted pro hac vice)
Covington & Burling LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.
Washington, DC 20004‐2401
Telephone: (202) 662‐6000
Facsimile: (202) 662‐6291
Email:
gpappas@cov.com
Email:
rrainey@cov.com
Counsel for Defendant Microsoft Corporation
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
MEDIOSTREAM, INC.,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ET AL.,
Defendants.
18
20
22
Declaration of Scott Schrader in
Support of Defendants’ Renewed
Motion to Stay the Case Pending
Completion of Inter Partes
Reexamination Pending Before the
Patent and Trademark Office
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Place:
19
21
Civil Case No. 5:11‐cv‐02525‐HRL
23
24
Civil Case No. 5:11‐cv‐2525‐HRL
Declaration of Scott Schrader in Support of
Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Pending
Reexamination
August 16, 2011
10:00 am
Hon. Howard R. Lloyd
San Jose Courthouse,
Courtroom 2
1
I, Scott Schrader, state as follows:
2
3
4
5
6
1.
for defendant Microsoft Corporation in this case. I am admitted to practice in
California and New York, and before this Court. I submit this declaration in support
of the Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of Inter Partes
Reexamination Pending Before the Patent and Trademark Office.
7
8
I am an attorney with the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, counsel
2.
Attached as exhibits to this declaration are true and correct copies of the
following documents:
9
Exhibit
10
Description
Date
Reexamination of the ’655 patent
11
Ex. 1
Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination
and Decision Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S.
Patent No. 7,009,655, PTO Control No. 95/001,284
3/12/2010
Ex. 3
Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination and Detailed
Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
7,009,655, PTO Control No. 95/001,284
3/12/2010
Ex. 4
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination
of U.S. Patent No. 7,009,655, PTO Control No. 95/001,284
7/2/2010
Ex. 5
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of
U.S. Patent No. 7,009,655, PTO Control No. 95/001,284
2/14/2011
Ex. 6
Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal in Inter Partes
Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,009,655, PTO Control
No. 95/001,284
3/14/2011
Ex. 7
Patent Owner’s Appeal Brief filed by MedioStream Inc. in
Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,009,655,
PTO Control No. 95/001,284 (without exhibits)
4/28/2011
Ex. 8
13
12/18/2009
Ex. 2
12
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
7,009,655 filed by Apple Inc. (without exhibits)
Respondent’s Brief (Requestor) filed by Apple Inc. in Inter
Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,009,655, PTO
Control No. 95/001,284
5/31/2011
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Civil Case No. 5:11‐cv‐2525‐HRL
Declaration of Scott Schrader in Support of
Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Pending
Reexamination
2
1
Exhibit
2
Date
Reexamination of the ’172 patent
3
Ex. 9
Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination
and Decision Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S.
Patent No. 7,283,172, PTO Control No. 95/001,283
4/23/2010
Ex. 11
Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination and Detailed
Action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
7,283,172, PTO Control No. 95/001,283
4/23/2010
Ex. 12
Action Closing Prosecution in Inter Partes Reexamination
of U.S. Patent No. 7,283,172, PTO Control No. 95/001,283
8/20/2010
Ex. 13
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Partes Reexamination of
U.S. Patent No. 7,283,172, PTO Control No. 95/001,283
1/28/2011
Ex. 14
Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal in Inter Partes
Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,283,172, PTO Control
No. 95/001,283
2/28/2011
Ex. 15
Patent Owner’s Appeal Brief filed by MedioStream Inc. in
Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,283,172,
PTO Control No. 95/001,283 (without exhibits)
4/28/2011
Ex. 16
5
Corrected Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S.
3/23/2010
Patent No. 7,283,172 filed by Apple Inc. (without exhibits)
Ex. 10
4
Respondent’s Brief (Requester) filed by Apple Inc. in Inter
Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,283,172, PTO
Control No. 95/001,283
5/31/2011
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Description
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
19
Executed in San Francisco, California on June 22, 2011.
20
21
/s/ Scott Schrader
Scott Schrader
22
23
24
Civil Case No. 5:11‐cv‐2525‐HRL
Declaration of Scott Schrader in Support of
Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Pending
Reexamination
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?