Villasenor v. Cate

Filing 13

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to File; finding as moot 9 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
FRANCISCO VILLASENOR,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
MATTHEW CATE,
13
Defendant.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 11-3662 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT
(Docket Nos. 7, 9)

15
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
16
against Secretary Matthew Cate. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for an
17
extension of time to file a dispositive motion. Defendant’s motion is granted. His dispositive
18
motion is due no later than February 2, 2012. Plaintiff’s opposition is due thirty days
19
thereafter. Defendant must file his reply within fifteen days of the filing date of Plaintiff’s
20
opposition.
21
Plaintiff has requested a motion for extension of time to file formal discovery. However,
22
on January 9, 2012, the parties stipulated to staying discovery until the Court resolves
23
Defendant’s dispositive motion, which has not yet been filed. In light of the stipulation,
24
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is denied as moot.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED:
27

1/18/12
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

28
Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time as
Moot
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Villasenor662eot.wpd