Rivera-Diaz v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 7

Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1) for transfer of this action to the Northern District of California received from the US Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation re: MDL 2250. CTO-1 directed to the ND of California for filing. Order becomes effective upon receipt of certified copy from the transferee court. (Attachments: # 1 CTO-1 and Schedule of Tag-A-Long Actions) (li)

Download PDF
Case PR/3:11-cv-01433 Document 40 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: IPHONE/IPAD APPLICATION CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION MDL No. 2250 (SEE AITACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-l) On August 8, 20 ll, the Panel transferred 1 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern Distirct of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (lP.M.L. 2011). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern Distirct of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh. It appears that the action( s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern Distirct of California and assigned to Judge Koh. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Liti~ation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U .S.C. § 1407 to the Northern Distirct of California for the reasons stated in the order of August 8, 2011, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern Distirct of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this lime, the stay is lifted. Sep 07,2011 CLERK'S OFFICE UNITEO STATES JUDICIAl.. PANEL ON MULT10ISTRICT LITIGATION FOR THE PANEL: ~. Jeffery N. LUthi Clerk of the Panel Case PR/3:11-cv-01433 Document 40 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 2 IN RE: IPHONE/IPAD APPLICATION CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION MDL No. 2250 SCHEDULE CTO-l - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ALABAMA NORTHERN ALN ALN 2 2 11-01376 11-01855 Burke et al v. Apple Inc et al Burke et at v. Apple, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 11-03450 Kevin Burwick et al v. Apple, Inc. et al 11-00895 Ajjampur et al v. Apple, Inc. FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 8 FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 9 11-80658 Boswell v. Apple, Inc. ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 11-03268 Moylan v. Apple, Inc. ILLINOIS SOUTHERN 11 00359 Q'Flaftetty v. Af'f'le Iae. Opposed 09/06/2011 MISSOURI EASTERN 4 11 00784 Sayaer et al v. Af'f'le Iae. Opposed 09/06/2011 NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 7 11-02841 Ammer v. Apple, Inc. et al 11-01433 Rivera-Diaz v. APPLE, Inc. et al PUERTO RICO PR 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?