Tatum v. Buckley
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
IRVIN T. TATUM,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
C. BUCKLEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-4864 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
PROOFS OF SERVICE
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil rights complaint
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 21, 2011, the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint
19
and determined that he alleged cognizable claims for relief. The Court further recognized that,
20
because Plaintiff had paid the filing fee, he could not rely upon the United States Marshal for
21
service upon the named Defendants. Plaintiff was directed to provide the Court with proofs of
22
service of the summons and complaint on all the Defendants, or show good cause why they
23
should not be dismissed.
24
On January 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed with the Court a motion for extension of time to file
25
proofs of service. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall provide his proofs of service
26
no later than thirty days from the filing date of this order. Failure to comply or demonstrate
27
good cause within thirty days from the filing date of this order, will result in dismissal of
28
Order Granting Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File Proofs of Service
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Tatum864psrv-eot.wpd
1
2
3
4
the unserved Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
2/6/12
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File Proofs of Service
2
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Tatum864psrv-eot.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?