In Re: iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation

Filing 54

REPLY (re #42 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6); Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities ) filed byApple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Marc J. Zwillinger)(Zwillinger, Marc) (Filed on 4/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Marc J. Zwillinger (pro hac vice) marc@zwillgen.com ZWILLGEN PLLC 1705 N St NW Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.296.3585 Penelope A. Prevolos (CA SBN 87607) PPrevolos@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc., a California Corporation 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 In Re: iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation, Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK DECLARATION OF MARC ZWILLINGER IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK Declaration of Marc Zwillinger in Support of Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the First Consolidated Class Action Complaint 1 2 I, Marc J. Zwillinger, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at law admitted to practice pro hac vice before this Court, as well 3 as the Courts of the State of Illinois and the District of Columbia. I am the founder of 4 ZwillGen PLLC and counsel for Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in this litigation. I make 5 this declaration upon personal knowledge and could and would competently testify to the 6 matters below if called to do so. 7 8 9 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts of the official transcript of this Court’s May 25, 2011 hearing. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Q&A on 10 Location Data, http://www.apple.com/pr/library/04/27Apple-Q-A-on-Location-Data.html, 11 which is referenced in Plaintiffs’ complaint at paragraph 145, note 13. 12 4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 13 that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on April 5, 2012, 14 at Park City, Utah. 15 16 /s/Marc J. Zwillinger 17 Marc J. Zwillinger 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK Declaration of Marc Zwillinger in Support of Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the First Consolidated Class Action Complaint 1 EXHIBIT A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK Declaration of Marc Zwillinger in Support of Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the First Consolidated Class Action Complaint Case5:10-cv-05878-LHK Document138 Filed06/10/11 Page1 of 78 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 6 IN RE: IPHONE APPLICATION LITIGATION 7 8 _________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C-10-05878 LHK SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA MAY 25, 2011 PAGES 1-78 9 10 11 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 A P P E A R A N C E S: 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFF: KAMBER LAW BY: SCOTT A. KAMBER AND DEBORAH KRAVITZ 100 WALL STREET, 23RD FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005 FOR APPLE: HOGAN LOVELLS BY: MICHAEL L. CHARLSON AND MAREN J. CLOUSE 525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BY: JEREMY R. WILSON 302 N. MARKET STREET, SUITE 501 DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 22 23 APPEARANCES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 24 25 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER: LEE-ANNE SHORTRIDGE, CSR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9595 1 Case5:10-cv-05878-LHK Document138 Filed06/10/11 Page2 of 78 1 2 APPEARANCES (CONTINUED) 3 4 FOR ADMOB: 5 DURIE TANGRI BY: MICHAEL H. PAGE 217 LEIDESDORFF STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 6 7 FOR ADMAR AND MELLENIAL MEDIA: COOLEY, GODWARD, KRONISH BY: MICHAEL RHODES 101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 FOR FLURRY AND PINCH MEDIA: GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER BY: JOSHUA A. JESSEN 3161 MICHELSON DRIVE IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92612 8 9 10 11 12 13 FOR TRAFFICMARKETPLACE.COM: 14 K&L GATES BY: DAVID A. BATEMAN 925 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 2900 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 15 FOR NPR: COVINGTON & BURLINGTON BY: MALI B. FRIEDMAN ONE FRONT STREET, 35TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 FOR MOBCLIX: DLA PIPER BY: CARTER W. OTT 555 MISSION STREET, SUITE 2400 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 Case5:10-cv-05878-LHK Document138 Filed06/10/11 Page39 of 78 1 PENDING AT THE FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ON 2 APRIL 6TH THAT WE HAD. 3 SINCE THAT POINT IN TIME, THERE WAS A 4 CLUSTER OF CASES THAT WERE FILED IMMEDIATELY AFTER 5 A PRESS STORY BROKE ABOUT ONE PARTICULAR 6 APPLICATION, PANDORA, REVEALING IN ITS S.E.C. 7 STATEMENT THAT THERE WAS A GRAND JURY PROCEEDING 8 ASKING THEM QUESTIONS ABOUT THE APPLICATIONS. 9 FRANKLY, IN MY EXPERIENCE, YOUR HONOR, TO 10 CERTAIN ANTITRUST PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL AND CERTAIN 11 MASS TORT PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL, WHEN THEY SEE THE 12 WORDS "GRAND JURY" APPEAR, IT'S A LITTLE BIT LIKE 13 THE BELL FOR PAVLOV'S DOGS. 14 AND WHAT HAPPENED WAS THERE ARE -- ALMOST 15 ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS THAT WERE THEN FILED IN A 16 CLUSTER WERE VERBATIM COPIES OF THE COMPLAINTS THAT 17 WERE FILED IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. 18 SOME OF THOSE EVEN COPIED THE PLAINTIFFS' 19 ALLEGATIONS, FORGETTING TO CUT AND PASTE OUT THE 20 WORD -- FORGETTING TO TAKE OUT THE WORDS 21 "RELOCATING TO SAN JOSE FOR INTRADISTRICT 22 ASSIGNMENT." 23 24 25 SOME ACTUALLY COPIED THE PLAINTIFFS' ALLEGATIONS THEMSELVES. SO I DON'T MEAN TO BE, YOU KNOW, FLIP 39 Case5:10-cv-05878-LHK Document138 Filed06/10/11 Page40 of 78 1 ABOUT SOME OF THE OTHER CASES, BUT WHEN ONE LOOKS 2 BELOW THE SURFACE, YOU SEE THAT MOST OF THESE OTHER 3 CASES ARE, IN FACT, NOT UNIQUE CASES AT ALL, BUT 4 ARE MORE LIKE PLAYS BY PLAINTIFFS' COUNSELS TO TRY 5 TO PULL A CASE THAT ALL OF A SUDDEN, SIX MONTHS 6 AFTER IT WAS ORIGINALLY FILED, SEEMED INTERESTING 7 TO THEM. 8 9 THERE WAS ALSO A STORY THAT BROKE ON LITERALLY THE SAME DAY THAT THE CONSOLIDATED 10 COMPLAINT WAS FILED, IT PUBLICLY BROKE, WHICH DEALT 11 WITH THE ISSUE THAT'S BEEN MENTIONED A FEW TIMES 12 TODAY REGARDING THE ISSUE OF GEO LOCATION. 13 THAT GEO LOCATION ISSUE DOES EXIST IN THE 14 CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND IT IS RELATED AND GROWS 15 OUT OF THE SAME -- 16 THE COURT: I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU, 17 BUT HOW DO YOU SEE IT PLAYING OUT? 18 TO THEN HAVE ONE COUNSEL FROM EACH OF THE CASES 19 SERVE ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE? 20 THINK YOUR -- 21 MR. KAMBER: ARE YOU GOING WHAT DO YOU IT WOULD BE -- THE WAY I 22 WOULD ENVISION IT, YOUR HONOR, WOULD BE THAT YOU 23 WOULD NOT HAVE THAT, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY IF YOU HAD 24 18 MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, YOU WOULD DO 25 EXACTLY WHAT THIS COURT WAS CONCERNED ABOUT WHEN WE 40 Case5:10-cv-05878-LHK Document138 Filed06/10/11 Page78 of 78 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 5 6 7 8 9 I, THE UNDERSIGNED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 10 THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 280 SOUTH 11 FIRST STREET, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY 12 CERTIFY: 13 THAT THE FOREGOING TRANSCRIPT, 14 CERTIFICATE INCLUSIVE, CONSTITUTES A TRUE, FULL AND 15 CORRECT TRANSCRIPT OF MY SHORTHAND NOTES TAKEN AS 16 SUCH OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER OF THE PROCEEDINGS 17 HEREINBEFORE ENTITLED AND REDUCED BY COMPUTER-AIDED 18 TRANSCRIPTION TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY. 19 20 21 22 23 24 /S/ _____________________________ LEE-ANNE SHORTRIDGE, CSR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9595 25 78 1 EXHIBIT B 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:11-md-02250-LHK Declaration of Marc Zwillinger in Support of Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the First Consolidated Class Action Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?