Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Declaration of Michael L. Fazio in Support of #103 Opposition/Response to Motion, #104 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Fazio Decl., #2 Exhibit B to Fazio Decl., #3 Exhibit C to Fazio Decl., #4 Exhibit D to Fazio Decl., #5 Exhibit E to Fazio Decl., #6 Exhibit F to Fazio Decl., #7 Exhibit G to Fazio Decl., #8 Exhibit H to Fazio Decl., #9 Exhibit I to Fazio Decl., #10 Exhibit J to Fazio Decl., #11 Exhibit K to Fazio Decl., #12 Exhibit L to Fazio Decl., #13 Exhibit M to Fazio Decl.)(Related document(s) #103 , #104 ) (Shields, Patrick) (Filed on 4/18/2012)
trial lawyers | los angeles
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 | TEL: (213) 443-3000 FAX: (213) 443-3100
April 11, 2012
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Apple v. Samsung Elecs. Co. et al, Case No 12-cv-630
I write in advance of the parties' continued meet and confer today regarding Samsung's
Responses and Objections to Apple's First Set of Preliminary Injunction Requests for Production.
In a good faith effort to meet and confer, Samsung agrees to supplement its prior responses to
produce responsive non-privileged documents to Apple's Request for Production Nos. 4, 7, 27,
28, 29, 31, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 89.
With respect to Apple's Request for Production Nos. 9-13, though Samsung has made clear on
numerous occasions that it does not have the source code for Galaxy Nexus, Apple contends that
these requests also seek "any other instructions utilized by or implemented on the Samsung
Galaxy Nexus." See April 6, 2012 Letter from Buroker to Fazio at 3. If Apple can clarify what
it means by "any other instructions" then Samsung will consider producing documents
responsive to these five requests.
Additionally, with respect to Apple's Request for Production Nos. 32, to the extent that this
request extends to Samsung's expert witnesses who will provide declarations in support of
Samsung's forthcoming Opposition Brief, Samsung will produce documents relied upon by those
experts. Samsung notes that this "relied upon" limitation is consistent with the Protective Order
applied on an interim basis in this case. See Protective Order, ¶ 20.
quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp
NEW YORK |
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10010-1601 | TEL (212) 849-7000 FAX (212) 849-7100
50 California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4788 | TEL (415) 875-6600 FAX (415) 875-6700
SILICON VALLEY | 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 | TEL (650) 801-5000 FAX (650) 801-5100
CHICAGO | 500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510 | TEL (312) 705-7400 FAX (312) 705-7401
WASHINGTON, DC | 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 825, Washington, District of Columbia 20004-2400 | TEL (202) 538-8000 FAX (202) 538-8100
LONDON | 16 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EG, United Kingdom | TEL +44 20 7653 2000 FAX +44 20 7653 2100
TOKYO | NBF Hibiya Building, 25F, 1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan | TEL +81 3 5510 1711 FAX +81 3 5510 1712
MANNHEIM | Mollstraße 42, 68165 Mannheim, Germany | TEL +49 621 43298 6000 FAX +49 621 43298 6100
MOSCOW | Voentorg Building, 3rd Floor, 10 Vozdvizhenka Street, Moscow 125009, Russia | TEL +7 495 797 3666 FAX +7 495 797 3667
SAN FRANCISCO |
Similarly, as to Apple's Request for Production No. 84, Samsung will produce documents relied
upon by Samsung's experts in connection with Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Preliminary
Injunction Motion. See Protective Order, ¶ 20.
Finally, we will discuss the remainder of the issues raised by Apple in its April 6, 2012 letter
during the continued meet and confer today.
Very truly yours,
Michael L. Fazio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?