Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 285

OPPOSITION to ( #269 MOTION for leave to Amend Its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions ) filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.(a Korean corporation), Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Fazio ISO Samsung's Opposition, #2 Exhibit A-J to Fazio Declaration)(Fazio, Michael) (Filed on 10/19/2012) Modified text on 10/22/2012 (dhmS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 2 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 3 Kevin A. Smith (Bar No. 250814) kevinsmith@quinnemanuel.com 4 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 6 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129 (CA); 7 2542082 (NY)) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com 8 Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com 9 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 10 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 11 William C. Price (Bar No. 108542) 12 williamprice@quinnemanuel.com 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 13 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 14 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP John Caracappa (pro hac vice) jcaracappa@steptoe.com 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 429-6267 Facsimile: (202) 429-3902 15 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 16 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 20 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 12-CV-00630-LHK (PSG) 21 DECLARATION OF MICHAEL L. FAZIO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO APPLE INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS & INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 22 Plaintiff, vs. 23 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG 24 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG 25 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 26 Defendants. 27 Date: Time: Place: Judge: November 6, 2012 10:00 a.m. Courtroom 5 Honorable Paul S. Grewal 28 Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHK (PSG) FAZIO DECL. ISO SAMSUNG'S OPP. TO APPLE'S MOT. FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 1 DECLARATION OF MICHAEL L. FAZIO 2 I, Michael L. Fazio, declare as follows: 3 1. I am a member of the bar of the State of California, admitted to practice before this 4 Court, and a partner with Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, attorneys for defendants 5 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung 6 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) in this action. I make this 7 declaration of personal, firsthand knowledge, and if called and sworn as a witness, I could and 8 would testify as set forth below. 9 2. On June 15, 2012, Apple served its infringement contentions via email and FTP. 10 The exhibits to Apple’s infringement contentions had several duplicate charts: Exhibits 69 and 81 11 both corresponded to ’604 patent claim charts against the Admire; Exhibits 71 and 83 both 12 corresponded to ’604 patent claim charts against the Galaxy S II – AT&T; Exhibits 70 and 82 both 13 corresponded to ’604 patent claim charts against the Galaxy S II Skyrocket; Exhibits 136 and 137 14 both corresponded to ’647 patent claim charts against the Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus; Exhibits 129 and 15 135 both corresponded to ’647 patent claim charts against the Galaxy Tab 8.9. Attached hereto as 16 Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the cover pages for Exhibits 69, 81, 70, 82, 71, and 83, 17 respectively, as originally provided by Apple. Eight charts were also missing from Apple’s 18 production: ’604 patent claim charts against the Conquer 4G, Dart, Exhibit II 4G, and Galaxy Tab 19 7.0 Plus; ’647 patent claim charts against the Galaxy Player 4.0 and Galaxy Player 5.0; and ’959 20 patent claim charts against the Galaxy Nexus and Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus. 21 3. On June 19, 2012, I received an email from Apple indicating that it had made 22 changes to the exhibits to its infringement contentions on its FTP site. According to the email, 23 Apple had “inadvertently uploaded to the FTP two versions of the ’647 patent claim charts for 24 each of the Galaxy Tab 8.9 and the Galaxy Tab 7.0 and therefore did not upload the ’647 patent 25 claim charts for the Galaxy Player 4.0 and the Galaxy Player 5.0.” Apple also “inadvertently 26 uploaded incorrect versions of the ’721 patent claim charts for the Samsung Illusion (Exhibit 98) 27 and the Samsung Stratosphere (Exhibit 99).” Apple stated it had “posted corrected versions of 28 Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHK (PSG) FAZIO DECL. ISO SAMSUNG'S OPP. TO APPLE'S MOT. FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS -1- 1 the charts to the FTP.” Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an email from 2 Angela Wilkins, received June 19, 2012, which informed Samsung of these errors. 3 4. On August 7, 2012, I received a letter from Apple detailing additional errors with 4 the infringement contentions that Apple had uploaded to its FTP site on June 15. According to 5 this letter, Apple had “inadvertently left off [the] ftp site during delivery” “Exhibits 87, 141 and 6 142.” However, Apple had included an Exhibit 87 on its FTP. Original Exhibit 87 was a ’959 7 patent claim chart against the Galaxy Tab 8.9. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct 8 copy of the letter from Apple’s counsel, Emily L. Fedman, without enclosures, addressed to 9 Patrick Shields, received August 7, 2012. 10 5. On October 1, 2012, Apple notified Samsung via email that it had placed proposed 11 amended infringement contentions on its FTP site. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and 12 correct copy of this email from Apple’s counsel, Jennifer Rho, received October 1, 2012. The 13 proposed amended contentions included, for the first time, claim charts for the ’604 patent against 14 the Conquer 4G, Dart, and Exhibit II 4G. 15 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of an article by PR 16 Newswire titled “Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1 Has Arrived: Game-Changing Device Hits U.S. 17 Store Shelves Tomorrow” dated August 15, 2012, and downloaded from 18 http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/samsung-galaxy-note-101-has-arrived19 166257736.html on October 16, 2012. 20 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of a Samsung 21 Telecommunications America press release titled “SAMSUNG Mobile Unveils Premium 22 Accessory Suite for Galaxy Tab™ 10.1,” dated June 21, 2011, and downloaded from 23 http://www.samsung.com/us/news/newsRead.do?news_seq=19881&gltype on October 16, 2012. 24 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of reviews of the Galaxy 25 Tab™ Conductive Stylus titled “Reviews & Ratings – Galaxy Tab Accessories ET-S100CBEG” 26 with one review dated March 1, 2011, downloaded from 27 http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/galaxy-tab-accessories/ET-S100CBEGSTA-reviews on 28 October 16, 2012. Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHK (PSG) FAZIO DECL. ISO SAMSUNG'S OPP. TO APPLE'S MOT. FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS -2- 1 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of an entry on the Google+ 2 social network titled “The rollout of Android 4.1, Jelly Bean, begins today…” dated July 11, 2012, 3 and downloaded from https://plus.google.com/+Nexus/posts/QLETQNekJ6D on October 16, 4 2012. 5 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of an entry on the Google 6 Groups message board titled “4.1.2 in AOSP” dated October 9, 2012, and downloaded from 7 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/android-building/2rkEoKMnhzU/3s-GgaU_NT0J on 8 October 18, 2012. 9 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of a website on the Android 10 Open Source Project titled “Philosophy and Goals”, downloaded from 11 http://source.android.com/about/philosophy.html on October 18, 2012. 12 13 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 14 foregoing is true and correct. 15 Executed on October 19, 2012. 16 17 /s/ Michael L. Fazio Michael L. Fazio 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHK (PSG) FAZIO DECL. ISO SAMSUNG'S OPP. TO APPLE'S MOT. FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?