The Bank of New York Mellon FKA: et al v. Brewer et al

Filing 23

AMENDED ORDER RE: 16 , 19 , 20 DEFENDANTS REQUESTS FOR ABATEMENT/DISMISSAL. Since Defendants requests do not comply with Local Rule 7, the court is unable to consider them as presented and will therefore take no action on the documents referenced above. Defendants are ordered to conform any additional requests for relief to Civil Local Rule 7. Any further non-conforming documents will not be considered. This amended order shall supersede Docket Item No. 22. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/22/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/22/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN JOSE DIVISION

5

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00829 EJD

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
FKA, et. al.,

6

AMENDED ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’
REQUESTS FOR
ABATEMENT/DISMISSAL

7
Plaintiff(s),
8

v.

9

DEANNE BREWER, et. al.,

10

[Docket Item No(s). 16, 19, 20]

Defendant(s).

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

/
11
12

Defendants Deanne Brewer and Spencer Brown (“Defendants”) have filed three documents

13

apparently requesting an order from the court either abating or dismissing this action. See Docket

14

Item Nos. 16, 19, 20.

15

Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, any written request to the court for an order must be

16

presented by one of the means contained in Civil Local Rule 7. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(a). Since

17

Defendants’ requests do not comply with Local Rule 7, the court is unable to consider them as

18

presented and will therefore take no action on the documents referenced above.

19
20
21
22

Defendants are ordered to conform any additional requests for relief to Civil Local Rule 7.
Any further non-conforming documents will not be considered.
This amended order shall supersede Docket Item No. 22.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: May 22, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
1

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00829 EJD
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ REQUESTS FOR ABATEMENT/DISMISSAL