E.K.D. et al v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 60

AFFIDAVIT re 57 MOTION to Transfer Case (Declaration of Matthew D. Brown in Support of Motion to Transfer) by Facebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K)(Brown, Matthew)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT B IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS E.K.D., by her next friend Melissa K. Dawes, and C.M.D., by his next friend Jennifer E. DeYong, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No: 3:11-cv-00461-GPM-SCW CLASS ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ INITIAL DISCLOSURES Plaintiffs disclose the following information pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A): I. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(a)(1)(A)(i) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information - along with the subjects of that information - that the [Plaintiffs] may use to support [their] claims or defenses, unless solely for impeachment; 1. Corporate Representatives of Facebook Inc. a. Document retention and collection efforts; b. Information concerning its management and decision-making structure; c. Information concerning its efforts to ensure users are using their true identities on facebook.com; d. The name and contact information for users who facebook’s records show were minors when their names or photos were used in connection with advertisements; the dates those identities were used in connection with advertisements, the number of advertisements in which the user’s identity appeared; the advertiser’s identity, the subject-matter of the advertisement; the number of unique impressions 1 for each advertisement; and the gross, or total, revenue that facebook received from such use; e. Information concerning the its efforts (or lack thereof) to obtain legal consent from minors whose name or photo were used in advertisements; f. The procedure an advertiser undertakes in order to place an advertisement on facebook that will include the name or profile picture of a minor user; g. Information concerning the cost to advertisers and value to facebook of advertisements featuring the name, profile picture, or identity of users; h. User feedback concerning facebook advertisements featuring the name, profile picture, or identity of users; 2. The named plaintiffs’ personal representatives The named plaintiffs’ personal representatives have knowledge regarding the lack of legal consent to the use of their children’s names and likenesses in advertising; the age of their children; and their ability to fairly and adequately serve as class representatives. 3. Plaintiffs’ counsel Plaintiffs’ counsel have knowledge regarding their ability to fairly and adequately serve as class counsel; they have knowledge regarding their experience in class actions and other complex litigation; they also have information regarding reasonable attorneys’ fees in this case and costs. II. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(a)(1)(A)(ii) a copy of – or a description by category and location – of all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things that [Plaintiffs] ha[ve] in [their] possession, custody, or control and may use to support [their] claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment; 1. None. III. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(a)(1)(A)(iii). a computation of any category of damages claimed by [Plaintiffs] ...; 2 1. Damages in this matter may be calculated as: a. # of unique impressions of infringing advertisements × $ of statutory penalty + punitive damages + attorneys’ fees + interest + costs = damages; b. $ profit derived from infringing advertisements + punitive damages + attorneys’ fees + interest + costs = damages c. $ actual damages from infringing advertisements + punitive damages + attorneys’ fees + interest + costs = damages IV. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(a)(1)(A)(iv) for inspection and copying as under Rule 34, any insurance agreement under which an insurance business may be liable to satisfy all or part of a judgment which may be entered in the action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment. 1. None. KOREIN TILLERY /s Aaron M. Zigler Steven A. Katz Aaron M. Zigler One U.S. Bank Plaza 505 N. 7th Street, Suite 3600 St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1625 Telephone: (314) 241-4844 Facsimile: (314) 214-3525 skatz@koreintillery.com azigler@koreintillery.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS E.K.D., by her next friend Melissa K. Dawes, and C.M.D., by his next friend Jennifer E. DeYong, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No: 3:11-cv-00461-GPM-SCW CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 3, 2011, I electronically served the foregoing document on:       Matthew D. Brown Jeffrey M. Gutkin Michael C. Hermann Michael G. Rhodes Charles J. Swartwout Steven A. Katz KOREIN TILLERY /s Aaron M. Zigler One U.S. Bank Plaza 505 N. 7th Street, Suite 3600 St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1625 Telephone: (314) 241-4844 Facsimile: (314) 214-3525 azigler@koreintillery.com 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?