Beasley v. Lake County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 6

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. Amended Complaint due by 8/10/2012. Failure to respond in ac cordance with this order by filing an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. The Clerk shall include two copies of the court's complaint with a copy of this order to plaintiff. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Prisoner Complaint)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBBY ALAN BEASLEY, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 15 LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 16 Defendants. No. C 12-01640 EJD (PR) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Lake County Correctional Facility in Lakeport, filed the 18 19 instant civil rights action in pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against county officials 20 for unconstitutional acts. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be 21 granted in a separate written order. 22 DISCUSSION 23 24 25 A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a 26 prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a 27 governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify 28 any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\CR.12\01640Beasley_dwlta.wpd 1 1 claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is 2 immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must, however, be 3 liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 4 1988). To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential 5 6 elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was 7 violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the 8 color of state law. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). 9 B. 10 Plaintiff’s Claims Plaintiff alleges that the court imposed excessive bail when it raised bail from 11 $15,000 to $1,000,000. Plaintiff also claims that when he refused to give a blood sample, 12 officers held him down and forced a blood draw without probable cause. Liberally 13 construed, Plaintiff’s claims are cognizable under § 1983 as a violation of the Eighth and 14 Fourth Amendments. However, the claims are deficient because Plaintiff fails to identify 15 the individual defendants who committed the alleged violations. Plaintiff shall be granted 16 leave to file an amended complaint to attempt to correct this deficiency. 17 Plaintiff is advised that to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, he must allege that 18 a person acting under the color of state law committed a violation of a right secured by 19 the Constitution or laws of the United States. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). 20 Plaintiff must identify defendants by name and state how each individual defendant 21 violated a specific federal right. 22 CONCLUSION 23 24 For the foregoing reasons, the Court orders as follows: 25 The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Within thirty (30) days of 26 the date this order is filed, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. The amended 27 complaint must include the caption and civil case number used in this order and the words 28 “AMENDED COMPLAINT” on the first page and write in the case number for this Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\CR.12\01640Beasley_dwlta.wpd 2 1 action, Case No. C 12-01640 EJD (PR). If using the court form complaint, Plaintiff must 2 answer all the questions on the form in order for the action to proceed. 3 Failure to respond in accordance with this order by filing an amended 4 complaint will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without 5 further notice to Plaintiff. 6 7 The Clerk shall include two copies of the court’s complaint with a copy of this order to plaintiff. 8 9 DATED: 7/10/2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\CR.12\01640Beasley_dwlta.wpd 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBBY ALAN BEASLEY, Case Number: CV12-01640 EJD Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. LAKE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, et al., Defendants. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 7/10/2012 That on , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Robby Alan Beasley 66842 Lake County Correctional Facility 4913 Helbush Drive Lakeport, CA 95453 Dated: 7/10/2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?