Janolkar et al v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise indicated a reason for not doing so. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/20/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/20/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03692 EJD SHIRKANT JANOLKAR, et. al., 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA), et. al., 14 15 Defendant(s). / 16 17 On October 17, 2012, the court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss and ordered Plaintiffs 18 to file an amended complaint on or before November 19, 2012. See Docket Item No. 5. The court 19 admonished Plaintiffs that failure to file an amended complaint as directed could result in the 20 dismissal of this action without further notice. 21 As of this date, Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise indicated a 22 reason for not doing so. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of 23 prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: November 20, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03692 EJD ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?