Hawn v. Defense Language Institute in Monterey CA et al
Filing
44
ORDER granting 43 Plaintiff's Request for Leave to File Sur-reply. The sur-reply filed by Plaintiff 41 will be considered in connection with Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss. Defendant may file a response to Plaintiff's su r-reply on or before 1/15/2014. Once this response is filed, no further briefing will be considered for the Motion to Dismiss and no such briefing should be filed by either party. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/6/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/6/2014: # 1 Certficate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-05014 EJD
KAMINI HAWN,
11
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army,
[Docket Item No(s). 43]
14
Defendant(s).
15
16
/
Plaintiff’s request for leave to file a sur-reply (Docket Item No. 43) is GRANTED. The sur-
17
reply filed by Plaintiff on October 3, 2013 (Docket Item No. 41) will be considered in connection
18
with Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss. Defendant’s objection to the sur-reply (Docket Item
19
No. 42), although well-taken, is OVERRULED.
20
Pursuant to his request, Defendant may file a response to Plaintiff’s sur-reply on or before
21
January 15, 2014. Once this response is filed, no further briefing will be considered for the Motion
22
to Dismiss and no such briefing should be filed by either party.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: January 6, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-05014 EJD
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO FILE SUR-REPLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?