Izadkhah v. Astrue

Filing 28

ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF. The court modifies the briefing schedule such that Plaintiff shall serve and file a motion for summary judgment and/or for remand on or before 1/31/2014. Briefing shall thereafter proceed according to the deadlines contained in the Social Security Procedural Order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/3/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/3/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-05250 EJD MONIR IZADKHAH, 6 ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF Plaintiff(s), 7 8 v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 9 10 Defendant(s). For the Northern District of California United States District Court / 11 12 Having determined that legal representation would benefit Plaintiff and considering pro bono 13 counsel is willing to accept an appointment at the request of the Federal Legal Assistance Self-Help 14 Program (“FLASH”), the court hereby appoints Christopher Kao and Lauren Cohen of Perkins Coie, 15 LLP, as counsel for Plaintiff in this action pursuant to the Guidelines of the Federal Pro Bono 16 Project. 17 18 Counsels’ appointment is limited to filing a Motion for Summary Judgment and reply brief as well as any other matters related to the pleadings in this action that may arise. 19 Due to the appointment of counsel, the court modifies the briefing schedule such that 20 Plaintiff shall serve and file a motion for summary judgment and/or for remand on or before 21 January 31, 2014. Briefing shall thereafter proceed according to the deadlines contained in the 22 Social Security Procedural Order. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 3, 2013 26 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 Case No. 5:12-cv-05250 EJD ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?