Izadkhah v. Astrue
ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF. The court modifies the briefing schedule such that Plaintiff shall serve and file a motion for summary judgment and/or for remand on or before 1/31/2014. Briefing shall thereafter proceed according to the deadlines contained in the Social Security Procedural Order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/3/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/3/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-05250 EJD
ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Having determined that legal representation would benefit Plaintiff and considering pro bono
counsel is willing to accept an appointment at the request of the Federal Legal Assistance Self-Help
Program (“FLASH”), the court hereby appoints Christopher Kao and Lauren Cohen of Perkins Coie,
LLP, as counsel for Plaintiff in this action pursuant to the Guidelines of the Federal Pro Bono
Counsels’ appointment is limited to filing a Motion for Summary Judgment and reply brief
as well as any other matters related to the pleadings in this action that may arise.
Due to the appointment of counsel, the court modifies the briefing schedule such that
Plaintiff shall serve and file a motion for summary judgment and/or for remand on or before
January 31, 2014. Briefing shall thereafter proceed according to the deadlines contained in the
Social Security Procedural Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 3, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
Case No. 5:12-cv-05250 EJD
ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?