In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION

Filing 106

RESPONSE (re #104 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) to Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Natalie Naugle in Support of Defendant Facebook, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, #2 Proposed Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal)(Brown, Matthew) (Filed on 2/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 COOLEY LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) (brownmd@cooley.com) JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083) (jgutkin@cooley.com) KYLE C. WONG (224021) (kwong@cooley.com) 101 California Street 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 14 In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation Case No. 5:12-md-02314 EJD 15 DECLARATION OF NATALIE NAUGLE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 16 17 18 DATE: TIME: COURTROOM: JUDGE: 19 20 April 28, 2016 9:00 a.m. 4 Hon. Edward J. Davila 21 22 I, Natalie Naugle, declare as follows: 23 1. I am Associate General Counsel for Litigation for Defendant Facebook, Inc. 24 (“Facebook”). I submit this declaration in response to Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File 25 Portions of Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss 26 Under Seal, filed on February 18, 2015 (Dkt. No. 104) (“Administrative Motion”). Except as 27 otherwise noted, I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below and, if called as a witness to 28 testify, could and would testify competently thereto. COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1. DECL. OF NATALIE NAUGLE I/S/O FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLFS’ ADMIN MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL – CASE NO. 5:12-MD-02314 EJD 1 2 Plaintiffs’ Opposition, Exhibit 2 to the Straite Declaration 2. Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of David A. Straite in Support of Plaintiffs’ 3 Administrative Motion is an unredacted version of Memorandum of Points and Authorities in 4 Opposition to Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss (“Opposition”). Plaintiffs’ Opposition contains non- 5 public, confidential, proprietary Facebook business information that Facebook designated as Highly 6 Confidential pursuant to the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order for Litigation Involving 7 Confidential Information and Trade Secrets entered by the Court on April 11, 2014 (Dkt. 75) (the 8 “Protective Order”). Specifically, Plaintiffs’ Opposition (at 2:24-26, 4:17-18, 24:2, 29:23-24, 33:25- 9 26, 35:19-22, 35:25-26, 36:6-8) includes information regarding Facebook’s internal discussions 10 regarding Facebook’s use of cookies. Facebook has spent significant time and resources developing 11 the operation of its website, including its use of cookies, which are used to deliver, secure, and 12 understand products, services, and ads, on and off Facebook’s website. The Opposition contains 13 information regarding Facebook’s strategic decisions with respect to how it uses cookies. Public 14 disclosure of the identified information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its 15 competitors access to sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against 16 Facebook. 17 3. That redaction at page 23, lines 12-13, is not necessary. This quote was included 18 unredacted in the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Likewise, the redaction 19 at page 33, lines 13-14, is not necessary. This statement does not concern Facebook’s business 20 operations or trade secrets. A copy of Exhibit 2 with proposed redactions narrowly tailored to redact 21 only the information identified in paragraph 2 above will be lodged with the Court under seal. 22 /s/ Natalie Naugle Natalie Naugle 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2. DECL. OF NATALIE NAUGLE I/S/O FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLFS’ ADMIN MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL – CASE NO. 5:12-MD-02314 EJD 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 5-1(i)(3) 2 I, Matthew D. Brown, attest that concurrence in the filing of this DECLARATION OF NATALIE 3 NAUGLE IN SUPPORT OF FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 4 TO FILE UNDER SEAL has 5 the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 22nd 6 day of February, 2016, at San Francisco, California. 7 Dated: February 22, 2016 8 9 been obtained from the signatory. I declare under penalty of perjury under COOLEY LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083) KYLE C. WONG (224021) 10 11 /s/ Matthew D. Brown Matthew D. Brown (196972) Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 128008262 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 3. DECL. OF NATALIE NAUGLE I/S/O FACEBOOK, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLFS’ ADMIN MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL – CASE NO. 5:12-MD-02314 EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?