In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION
Filing
179
NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Perrin Aikens Davis, Brian K. Lentz, Cynthia D. Quinn, Matthew J. Vickery. Appeal of Order #175 , Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion for Protective Order, Order on Motion to Compel #148 , Order on Motion to Dismiss, #87 , Order on Motion to Dismiss #174 (Appeal fee of $505 receipt number 0971-11952369 paid.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Representation Statement)(Straite, David) (Filed on 12/14/2017)
1
2
3
4
Frederic S. Fox (admitted pro hac vice)
David A. Straite (admitted pro hac vice)
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel.: (212) 687-1980
Fax: (212) 687-7714
dstraite@kaplanfox.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Laurence D. King (206423)
Mario M. Choi (243409)
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
350 Sansome Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel.: (415) 772-4700
Fax: (415) 772-4707
lking@kaplanfox.com
Stephen G. Grygiel (admitted pro hac vice)
SILVERMAN THOMPSON
SLUTKIN WHITE LLC
201 N. Charles Street, 26TH Floor
Baltimore, MD 21201
Tel.: (410) 385-2225
Fax: (410) 547-2432
sgrygiel@mdattorney.com
14
Counsel for Plaintiffs
15
16
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IN RE: FACEBOOK, INC. INTERNET
TRACKING LITIGATION
Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC
19
CLASS ACTION
20
REPRESENTATION STATEMENT
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC
REPRESENTATION STATEMENT
1
As required by Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 3-
2
2(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the parties to this
3
action are listed below along with the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of their respective
4
counsel.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Counsel for Plaintiffs Perrin Davis, Brian Lentz, Cynthia Quinn, Matthew Vickery:
Frederic S. Fox
Laurence D. King
David A. Straite
Mario M. Choi
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor
350 Sansome Street, Suite 400
New York, NY 10022
San Francisco, CA 94104
(212) 687-1980
(415) 772-4700
Stephen G. Grygiel
SILVERMAN THOMPSON SLUTKIN &WHITE LLC
201 N. Charles Street, 26TH Floor
Baltimore, MD 21201
(410) 385-2225
Counsel for Defendant Facebook, Inc.:
Michael G. Rhodes
Matthew D. Brown
Kyle C. Wong
COOLEY LLP
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
(415) 693-2000
DATED: December 14, 2017
KAPLAN, FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
By:
/s/ David A. Straite
David A. Straite
Frederic S. Fox (admitted pro hac vice)
David A. Straite (admitted pro hac vice)
850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel.: (212) 687-1980
Fax: (212) 687-7714
dstraite@kaplanfox.com
25
26
27
28
-1REPRESENTATION STATEMENT
Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
Laurence D. King (206423)
Mario M. Choi (243409)
350 Sansome Street, 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel.: (415) 772-4700
Fax: (415) 772-4707
lking@kaplanfox.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DATED: December 14, 2017
SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN & WHITE LLC
By:
/s/ Stephen G. Grygiel
Stephen G. Grygiel
10
Stephen G. Grygiel (admitted pro hac vice)
201 N. Charles Street, 26TH Floor
Baltimore, MD 21201
Tel.: (410) 385-2225
Fax: (410) 547-2432
sgrygiel@mdattorney.com
11
Counsel for Plaintiffs
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2REPRESENTATION STATEMENT
Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
I, David A. Straite, court-appointed interim lead counsel for the proposed Class, am the
3
ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the foregoing. In compliance with Civil
4
L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Stephen Grygiel has concurred in this filing.
5
6
/s/ David A. Straite
David A. Straite
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3REPRESENTATION STATEMENT
Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?