In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION

Filing 179

NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Perrin Aikens Davis, Brian K. Lentz, Cynthia D. Quinn, Matthew J. Vickery. Appeal of Order #175 , Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion for Protective Order, Order on Motion to Compel #148 , Order on Motion to Dismiss, #87 , Order on Motion to Dismiss #174 (Appeal fee of $505 receipt number 0971-11952369 paid.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Representation Statement)(Straite, David) (Filed on 12/14/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Frederic S. Fox (admitted pro hac vice) David A. Straite (admitted pro hac vice) KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor New York, NY 10022 Tel.: (212) 687-1980 Fax: (212) 687-7714 dstraite@kaplanfox.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Laurence D. King (206423) Mario M. Choi (243409) KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 350 Sansome Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel.: (415) 772-4700 Fax: (415) 772-4707 lking@kaplanfox.com Stephen G. Grygiel (admitted pro hac vice) SILVERMAN THOMPSON SLUTKIN WHITE LLC 201 N. Charles Street, 26TH Floor Baltimore, MD 21201 Tel.: (410) 385-2225 Fax: (410) 547-2432 sgrygiel@mdattorney.com 14 Counsel for Plaintiffs 15 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IN RE: FACEBOOK, INC. INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC 19 CLASS ACTION 20 REPRESENTATION STATEMENT 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC REPRESENTATION STATEMENT 1 As required by Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 3- 2 2(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the parties to this 3 action are listed below along with the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of their respective 4 counsel. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Counsel for Plaintiffs Perrin Davis, Brian Lentz, Cynthia Quinn, Matthew Vickery: Frederic S. Fox Laurence D. King David A. Straite Mario M. Choi KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor 350 Sansome Street, Suite 400 New York, NY 10022 San Francisco, CA 94104 (212) 687-1980 (415) 772-4700 Stephen G. Grygiel SILVERMAN THOMPSON SLUTKIN &WHITE LLC 201 N. Charles Street, 26TH Floor Baltimore, MD 21201 (410) 385-2225 Counsel for Defendant Facebook, Inc.: Michael G. Rhodes Matthew D. Brown Kyle C. Wong COOLEY LLP 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 (415) 693-2000 DATED: December 14, 2017 KAPLAN, FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP By: /s/ David A. Straite David A. Straite Frederic S. Fox (admitted pro hac vice) David A. Straite (admitted pro hac vice) 850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor New York, NY 10022 Tel.: (212) 687-1980 Fax: (212) 687-7714 dstraite@kaplanfox.com 25 26 27 28 -1REPRESENTATION STATEMENT Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP Laurence D. King (206423) Mario M. Choi (243409) 350 Sansome Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel.: (415) 772-4700 Fax: (415) 772-4707 lking@kaplanfox.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATED: December 14, 2017 SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN & WHITE LLC By: /s/ Stephen G. Grygiel Stephen G. Grygiel 10 Stephen G. Grygiel (admitted pro hac vice) 201 N. Charles Street, 26TH Floor Baltimore, MD 21201 Tel.: (410) 385-2225 Fax: (410) 547-2432 sgrygiel@mdattorney.com 11 Counsel for Plaintiffs 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2REPRESENTATION STATEMENT Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC 1 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 2 I, David A. Straite, court-appointed interim lead counsel for the proposed Class, am the 3 ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the foregoing. In compliance with Civil 4 L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Stephen Grygiel has concurred in this filing. 5 6 /s/ David A. Straite David A. Straite 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3REPRESENTATION STATEMENT Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?