In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION

Filing 4

NOTICE by Facebook Inc. of Pendency of, action, Ung v. Facebook, Inc., No. 112-cv-217244 (Ung), pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara Facebook intends to move the Superior Court for a stay of proceedings in Ung pending resolution this matter. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 3/16/2012) Modified on 3/19/2012 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT C ~ I JEFFS. WESTERMAN (SBN 94559) jwestennan@milberg.com 2 DAVID E. AZAR(SBN 218319) dazar@milberg.com 3 MILBERGLLP I -cr.: -~ bt'e One California Plaza 4 300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 5 Telephone: 213-617-1200 Facsimile: 213-617-1975 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 8 ~~~D San\f Clara 9/11 :46Frn David H. Yamasaki Chief Executive Of ic BY: msorum DTSCIVO 01 Rt201~$395 DO CK TL Case: 1-11- 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA II COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ) 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, V, FACEBOOK, Inc. 18 Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) case No lll C V ;,;;o 0 46 '7 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT COMPLAINT FOR: VIOLATION OF ARTICLE I, SECTION I OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT JURY TRIAL DEMAN'DED 19 20 21 22 23 /~·-........ ,,~.\ IL-ii 24 \1f\1]' ~~ 25 ,____.-·~, 26 0"1 i ..:J_; 27 ' 28 'I "L. l.J $395 00 2004 7 ' 10 RYANUNG, Clll CHENG and I3 ALICE ROSEN, 14 on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, ~-- CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [X)('S\555341v4 Co I TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ................................................................................................... I 4 NATURE OF THE ACTION ......................................................................................................... I 5 JURJSDICTION AND VENUE ..................................................................................................... I 6 THE PARTIES ................................................................................................................................ I 7 STATEMENT OF FACTS: ............................................................................................................ 2 8 About Facebook, Its "Like" Button, and Facebook Connect ..................................................... 2 9 Facebook ................................................ ................................................................................... 2 10 The Facebook '"'Like" Button .................. ................................................................................... 2 II Facebook Connect. ...................................................................................................................... 3 12 13 Facebook Uses the "Like" button and Facebook Connect To Track Facebook Members and Non-Members ............................................................................................................................. 3 14 CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS .............................................................................................. 6 15 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Violation of Article l, Section I of the California Constitution) .. 7 16 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Unjust Enrichment) .................................................................. 8 17 PRAYER FOR RELIEF ................................................................................................................. 9 18 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ...................................................................................................... 9 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 1- CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DOCS\.555341v4 .... ' ~ ' 1 2 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs allege the following, upon personal knowledge with respect to themselves, and 3 on information and belief derived from, among other things, investigation of counsel and review 4 of public documents, as to all other matters: 5 6 NATURE OF THE ACTION l. This is an action on behalf of a class of millions of California Internet users (as 7 defined herein) who have visited one or more websites displaying the Facebook "Like" button 8 (as defined below). The action arises from Facebook's surreptitious use of the "Like" button and 9 "Facebook Connect" to collect and store sensitive, private, and personally identifiable 10 information in violation of Article I, Section l of the California Constitution. The information is II secretly collected and stored regardless of whether the website visitor clicks the "Like" button 12 and, in most cases, regardless of whether the Internet user is a Facebook member. 13 14 15 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction over these proceedings because defendant Facebook is headquartered in the State of California, transacts business within this state, has committed 16 wrongful acts within lhe state, and has committed wrongful acts that have caused injuries to 17 persons within the state. 18 3. Venue lies in this court because many of those affected by defendants' v.Tongful 19 conduct reside in this county, and many of the potential witnesses reside and work in this county. 20 21 TilE PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Ryan Ung resides in San Francisco. Mr. Ung is a Facebook member who 22 visited websites that display the Facebook "Like" button. Facebook used the "Like" button to 23 track and collect his browsing histocy and link it to personally identifiable information without 24 his consent. 25 5. Plaintiff Chi Cheng resides in San Francisco. Mr. Cheng is a non-Facebook 26 member who visited a website in the Facebook Connect network and subsequently visited a 27 website displaying the Facebook "Like" button. Facebook used the Like Button and Facebook 28 -I CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DOCSIS5534lv4 1 Connect to collect his browsing history and personally identifiable information without his 2 3 consent. 6. Plaintiff Alice Rosen resides in Sunnyvale, California. Ms. Rosen is a non~ 4 Facebook member who visited a website in the Facebook Connect network and subsequently 5 visited a website displaying the Facebook "Like" button. Facebook used the Like Button and 6 Facebook Connect to collect her browsing history and personally identifiable information 7 without her consent. 8 7. Defendant Facebook ("hereinafter "Facebook") is a Delaware Corporation that 9 maintains its headquarters in Santa Clara County, California. Facebook conducts business lO throughout California, the nation, and internationally. II STATEMENT OF FACTS: About Facebook, Its "Like" Button, and Facebook Connect 12 13 Facebook 14 8. Facebook is the world's largest social networking website with more than 500 15 million registered users worldwide. 16 9. Facebook requires that Facebook registrants provide their actual names, rather 17 than merely create a «screen name" or "user name" as is commonplace with other, non-social 18 networking website registrations. Facebook then assigns each Facebook member a user ID 19 number that uniquely identifies that member. 20 The Facebook "Like" Button 21 10. The Facebook "Like" button is an image displaying a thumbs-up symbol 22 accompartied by the word "'Like." According to Facebook, the "Like" button allows Facebook 23 members to share third-party content that they find interesting, funny, or for which they have 24 some sort of affinity with other Facebook members. When a Facebook member clicks the 25 "Like" button on a website, an item appears on the user's Facebook profile page with a link back 26 to the website. Anyone can implement the "Like" button on their website by adding a computer 27 code, which is available for free and provided for by Facebook. 28 -2CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DOCS\55534lv4 1 2 3 "[t]he Like button lets a user share your content with friends on Facebook. When the user clicks the Like button on your site, a story appears in the user's friends' News Feed with a link back to your website. 4 i r 11. 12. Facebook promotes the "Like" button to website owners as follows: Website owners have a substantial financial incentive to include the "Like" button 5 on their websites because it tends to increase traffic to the website and thereby increase the 6 amount the website owner can charge for displaying advertising on the website. Indeed, more 7 than 2.5 million websites have integrated the Facebook "Like" button. According to comScore, 8 those 2.5 million websites include all of the top ten sports sites, nine of the top ten news sites, 9 nine of the top ten entertainment sites, and 18 of the top 25 retails sites. Overall, 80% of the 10 United States' comScore top websites are fully integrated. Evei)' day, 10,000 more websites add 11 the "Like" button. The "Like" button has become so deeply embedded in our societal 12 consciousness that we sometimes do not even realize how much it has permeated our culture. It 13 is an indelible part of the "online experience." 14 Facebook Connect 15 13. Facebook Connect enables Facebook members to log onto third-party websites, 16 applications, mobile devices, and gaming systems with their Facebook identity. While logged 17 on, users can connect with friends via these media and post information and updates to their 18 Facebook profile. Within a year of its launch in December 2008, Facebook Connect was on 19 almost 1 million websites, and in March 2009 more than 40 million unique visitors ofFacebook 20 Connect implementations were counted. 21 Facebook Uses the "Like" button and Facebook Connect To Track Facebook Members and Non-Members 22 14. Unbek:n0\\-11St to Internet users, Facebook uses the "Like" button to track Internet 23 users as they browse the web and thereby collects private and, in some cases, sensitive 24 information about them. Facebook follows Facebook members and, m some cases, non- 25 members as they browse the Internet, linking their records of each new page visited to 26 Facebook's records of all the "Like" button- or Facebook Connect-affiliated pages that the user 27 has visited in the previous minutes, months, and years. 1t may thereby construct and update a 28 -3CLASSACTIONCOMP~ DCXS05534lv4 1 long-term profile of what particular users are doing with their web browsers. Anyone who has 2 used the Internet to seek advice about hemorrhoids, sexually transmitted diseases, abortion, drug 3 rehabilitation, dementia - the list goes on and on - can be reasonably certain that Facebook 4 has tracked at least some of those visits and in many cases, identified them with a particular 5 individual, such that the information can easily be incorporated into a personal profile for sale to 6 marketers of all sorts, or to be put at the disposal of the United States or state government 7 agencies. The information is collected even if the website visitor does not click on the "Like" 8 button. This practice was brought to light by Arnold Roosendaal, whose work in progress, 9 Facebook Tracks and Traces Everyone: Like This!, IS available at 10 http:/www.ssrn.com/abstract=l717563. II 15. The tracking mechanism differs depending on whether the Internet user is a 12 Facebook member or not. 13 (a) Facebook Members: Upon registration, Facebook implants tracking 14 cookies on the members' computers. Each time the member visits a site displaying the Facebook 15 "Like" button, the updated Facebook cookie information, including the member's most recent 16 browsing history, is sent to Facebook Facebook can then link the cookie information with the 17 member's unique Facebook identifier, thereby associating the personally sensitive information 18 with the particular user and his account information. This occurs regardless of whether the 19 Facebook member clicks the "Like" button. 20 21 (b) If a Facebook member deactivates his or her account through the process Facebook provides, the entire account is nevertheless kept by Facebook, which can continue to 22 link data to the account just as when the account was active. If the users wish to delete the 23 account entirely, such that Facebook no longer has access to their personal data, they must make 24 a specific request to Facebook that takes two weeks to process. 25 (c) Non-Facebook Members: Facebook implants tracking cookies on the 26 computers ofnon-Facebook members when the non-Facebook member visits one of the million 27 websites in the Facebook Connect network Thereafter, Facebook's data profile of the non28 -4CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DOCS\55534lv4 I member is updated each time the non-Facebook member visits a site displaying the Facebook 2 "Like" button, even if the non-member does not click the ''Like" button. The data profile is 3 anonymous unless the non-member subsequently joins Facebook, at which point Facebook can 4 associate the previously anonymous "file" with the member and his or her account information, 5 which includes, at a minimUlll, the members' names and addresses. Facebook thus tracks and 6 collects extensive information about non-Facebook members- i.e. individuals who consciously 7 choose not to participate in Facebook. If a user subsequently opens an account on Facebook, aU 8 of the previously compiled information can be linked to the Facebook account holder and, from 9 that time on, all subsequent requests for Facebook content are accompanied by the Facebook l 0 identifier unique to the user. 11 16. The personal information collected by Facebook is an asset of the sort that is 12 priced, bought, and sold in discrete units for marketing and other pmposes. 'Websites and stores 13 can . . easily buy and sell infonnation on valued visitors with the intention of merging 14 behavioral with demographic and geographic data in ways that will create social categories that 15 advertisers covet and target with ads tailored to them or people like them." Joseph Turow, 16 Jennifer King, Chris Jay Hoofuagle, Amy Bleakley & Michael Hennessy, Americans Reject 17 Tailored Advertising and Three Activities that Enable 18 http://papers.ssm.com/sol31papers.cfm?abstract_id=l478214. It (Sept. 29, 2009), The more information that is 19 known about a consmner, the more a company will pay to deliver a precisely targeted 20 advertisement to him or her. 21 Change, Preliminary Staff Report (Dec. 2010) ("F.T.C. Report"), at 24. 22 23 17. See F.T.C., Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Personal data is viewed as currency. '""In many instances, consumers pay for free content and services by disclosing their personal information," according to former F.T.C. 2 4 commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour. F.T.C. Roundtable Series 1 on: Exploring Privacy (Matter 25 No. P095416) Dec. 7, 2009, at 148. (available athttp://www.ftc.gov/bcp/ 26 workshops/privacyroundtables/PrivacyRoundtable_ Dec 2009_Transcript. pdf). In Property, 27 Privacy, and Personal Data, Professor Paul M. Schwartz wrote: 28 -5CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DOC'S\55534lv4 I r Personal information is an important currency in the new millennium. The monetary value of personal data is large and still growing, and corporate America is moving quickly to profit from this trend. Companies view this information as a corporate asset and have invested heavily in software that facilitates the collection of consumer information. I 2 3 4 Paul M. Schwartz, Property, Privacy, and Personal Data, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2055, 2056-57 5 (2004). 6 18. On February 28, 2011, the Wall Street Journal published an article under the 7 headline 'Web's Hot New Connnodity: Privacy," in which it highlighted a company called 8 "Allow Ltd.," one of nearly a dozen companies that offer to sell people's personal information 9 on their behalf and give them 70% of the sale. An Allow Ltd. customer received a payment of 10 $8.95 for letting Allow tell a credit card company he is shopping for new plastic. !d. II 12 CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS 19. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 382, Plaintiffs bring this action 13 on behalf of themselves and two subclasses of Internet users: 1) all Facebook members who 14 visited a website displaying the Facebook "Like" button from April 22, 20IO to the date of filing 15 of this complaint; and 2) all non-Facebook members who visited a website in the Facebook 16 Connect network and subsequently visited a website displaying the Facebook "Like" button from 17 April22, 2010 to the date of the filing of this complaint. Venue is proper in this Court because 18 defendant Facebook maintains its principal place of business in this county and the defendants 19 engaged in wrongdoing in this county. 20 21 20. This Court has jurisdiction over these proceedings because defendant Facebook is located in the State of California, Facebook transacts business within this state, has committed 22 wrongful acts within the state, and has committed wrongful acts that caused injury to persons 23 within the state. 24 21. This action is properly maintainable as a class action. 25 22. The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. There are 26 tens of millions oflnternet users who have been tracked via the Facebook "Like" button. 27 28 -6CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DOCSi55534\v4 I 23. 2 alia, the following: 3 There are questions of law and fact that are common to the Class including, inter (a) whether Facebook engaged in conduct that invaded Plaintiffs' pnvacy 5 (b) whether Plaintiffs had a reasonable expectation of privacy as to the 6 interests invaded; 7 (c) whether the invasion of privacy was serious; 8 (d) whether this invasion of privacy caused Plaintiffs to suffer injury, damage, 9 loss, or harm; and 10 (e) 4 II 12 interests; whether Facebook was unjustly enriched by the unauthorized acquisition of Plaintiffs' personally identifiable information. 24. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately represent the Class. Plaintiffs are committed 13 to prosecuting this action and has retained competent counsel experienced in litigation of this 14 nature. Plaintiffs' claims are typical of the claims of other members of the Class and Plaintiffs 15 have the same interests as the other members of the Class. 16 25. Plaintiffs anticipate no difficulty in the management of this litigation. 17 26. Defendants have acted in a manner that affects Plaintiffs and all Class members 18 alike, thereby making appropriate injunctive, declaratory, and other relief appropriate with 19 respect to the Class as a whole. 20 27. The prosecution of separate actions by individual members of the Class would 21 create a risk of inconsistent or varying ad,judications with respect to individual members of the 22 Class, establish incompatible standards of conduct for defendants or adjudications with respect to 23 individual members of the Class, and could be dispositive of the interests of other members or 24 substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests. 25 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Violation of Article 1, Section 1 of the California Constitution) 26 27 28. 28 Plaintiffs incorporate each and every allegation as if fully set forth herein. - 7CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DOC'S\.555341v4 -• I 29. Article I, Section I of the California Constitution states that "All people are by 2 nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and 3 defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and 4 obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy." CaL Const. art I,§ I. 5 30. Plaintiffs had a legally protected interest in their personal Internet browsing 31. Plaintiffs reasonably expected that their browsing history would remam 6 history. 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 anonymous. 32. Facebook committed a serious invasion of Plaintiffs' privacy interest by using the Like" button and Facebook Cormect to secretly track Plaintiffs' website browsing history. 33. By the acts, transactions and courses of conduct alleged herein, defendant violated Plaintiffs' inalienable right to privacy. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Unjust Enrichment) 14 15 34. Plaintiffs incorporate each and every allegation as if fully set forth herein 16 35. Plaintiffs and the Class have conferred a benefit on Facebook. Facebook has 17 received and retained money belonging to Plaintiffs and the Class as a result of collecting and 18 storing its users' personal information, which is an asset, and selling it to third parties for 19 marketing purposes without the Internet users' knowledge. 20 36. Facebook appreciates or has knowledge of this benefit. 21 37. Under principles of equity and good conscience, Facebook should not be 22 permitted to retain money belonging to Plaintiffs and the Class that it unjustly received as a 23 result of its actions. 24 38. 25 Plaintiffs and the Class have suffered loss as a direct result of Facebook's conduct 26 27 28 -8CLASS ACTION CO?\.fPLAINT DOCS\555341v4 • • 39. - Plaintiffs, on their own behalf and on behalf of the Class, seek imposition of a 2 constructive trust on a restitution of the proceeds Facebook received as a result of its conduct 3 described herein and attorneys fees and costs pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code§ 1021.5. 4 II 5 PRAYER FOR RELffiF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and members of the Class seek relief against defendant as 6 follows: 7 A. Declaring that this action is properly maintainable as a class action and certifying 8 Plaintiffs as the representatives of the Class. 9 10 ll B. Declaring that Facebook's actions, as described here~ violate Article[, Section 1 of the California Constitution. Cal. Const. art I, § 1. C. Awarding injunctive and other equitable relief as is necessary to protect the 12 interests of Plaintiffs and the Class including, inter alia, an order prohibiting Facebook from 13 14 IS engaging in the wrongful and unlawful acts described herein. Disgorgement of aU revenue earned from selling or otherwise trading on the D. 16 private information obtained from Plaintiffs and the Class via the Facebook "Like" button. 17 18 E. Awarding Plaintiffs and the Class their reasonable litigation expenses and attorneys fees; and 19 Awarding such other and further relief as equity and justice may require. F. 20 21 22 DEMANDFORJURYTRIAL Plaintiffs hereby demand trial of their claims by jury to the extent authorized by law. 23 DATED: May6,2011 MILBERGLLP 24 JEFFS. WESTERMAN DA E.AZ ' 25 26 27 28 - 9CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT OOC:S\5S534!v4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?