In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION

Filing 56

Request for Judicial Notice re # 55 Reply to Opposition/Response, # 44 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS CORRECTED FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6)) filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) # 55 , # 44 ) (Brown, Matthew) (Filed on 8/22/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
([e-mail])
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
([e-mail])
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13

Case No. 5:12-md-02314 EJD

In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S REQUEST
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF
ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CORRECTED
FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT (FED. R. EVID. 201)

14
15
16
17
18

DATE:
TIME:
COURTROOM:
JUDGE:
TRIAL DATE:

19
20
21

October 5, 2012
9:00 a.m.
4
Edward J. Davila
None Set

22
23
24
25
26
27

Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Corrected First Amended
Consolidated Complaint (“Motion”) was heard on October 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in this Court.
Counsel for Facebook and counsel for Plaintiffs were in attendance and presented oral argument.
Having considered the parties’ papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, oral
argument, and all other materials properly considered by the Court including Facebook’s Request

28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FACEBOOK’S REQUEST FOR JUD. NOT.
NO. 5:12-MD-02314 EJD

1

for Judicial Notice in Support of its Reply in Support of the Motion, and good cause having been

2

shown, the Court issues the following findings and orders:

3
4
5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Facebook’s Request for Judicial Notice in support of its
Reply in Support of the Motion is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

DATED: __________________
THE HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11

2638013/ST

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FACEBOOK’S REQUEST FOR JUD. NOT.
NO. 5:12-MD-02314 EJD