In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION
Filing
69
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d Defendant Facebook, Inc.s Statement of Recent Decision Relevant to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Corrected First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint; Request for Leave filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) # 61 , # 44 ) (Brown, Matthew) (Filed on 10/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
(rhodesmg@cooley.com)
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
(brownmd@cooley.com)
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083)
(jgutkin@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
Case No. 5:12-md-02314 EJD
In re: FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING
LITIGATION
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
RELEVANT TO MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFFS’ CORRECTED FIRST
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT; REQUEST FOR
LEAVE
14
15
16
17
JUDGE:
TRIAL DATE:
18
Edward J. Davila
None Set
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1337468 /SF
1.
FACEBOOK’S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
NO. 5:12-MD-02314 EJD
1
On July 2, 2012, Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) filed a Motion to Dismiss
2
Plaintiffs’ Corrected First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Motion”).
3
October 5, 2012, this Court heard argument on Facebook’s Motion and took the matter under
4
submission. Facebook previously filed a Statement of Recent Decisions with this Court on March
5
7, 2013. (See Dkt. 61.)
On
6
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued a decision
7
relevant to the issues raised by the pending Motion.1 Facebook hereby seeks leave to provide that
8
decision as supplemental authority for the Court’s consideration when deciding the Motion. The
9
decision is attached as Exhibit A: In re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy
10
Litigation, No. 12-2358-SLR, slip op. (D. Del. Oct. 9, 2013).
11
12
Dated: October 10, 2013
13
COOLEY LLP
14
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
MATTHEW D. BROWN
15
Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
26
27
28
Indeed, numerous counsel for Plaintiffs here, including Edward Robertson and James Frickleton
(Bartimus Frickleton), David Straite (Stewarts Law), Stephen Grygiel (Keefe Bartels), Barry
Eichen (Eichen Crutchlow), and William Murphy (Murphy P.A.), also acted as counsel for the
plaintiffs in the Delaware action. See Amended Complaint, In re Google Inc. Cookie Placement
Consumer Privacy Litig., No. 12-2358-SLR (Dec. 19, 2012).
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1337468 /SF
2.
FACEBOOK’S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
NO. 5:12-MD-02314 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?