In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION
Filing
88
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONCERNING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR FACEBOOK'S MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Facebook Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeffrey M. Gutkin)(Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/20/2015)
1
7
COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
(rhodesmg@cooley.com)
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
(brownmd@cooley.com)
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083)
(jgutkin@cooley.com)
KYLE C. WONG (224021)
(kwong@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
8
Attorneys for Defendant FACBOOK, INC.
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation
Case No. 12-md-02314 EJD
DECLARATION OF JEFFREY M. GUTKIN
IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR FACEBOOK’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
16
17
18
JUDGE:
COURTROOM:
TRIAL DATE:
19
20
Edward J. Davila
4
Not Yet Set
21
22
I, Jeffrey M. Gutkin, declare as follows:
23
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California and a partner of
24
the law firm of Cooley LLP, counsel of record for defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”). I have
25
personal knowledge of the facts below and could and would testify competently to them if called
26
as a witness. I submit this declaration in support of the Parties’ “Stipulation and [Proposed]
27
Order Concerning Briefing Schedule for Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed concurrently
28
herewith.
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1.
GUTKIN DECL. I/S/O
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
1
2
2.
Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“SAC”) on or before November 30, 2015.
3
4
Plaintiffs’ counsel has informed me that they intend to file the anticipated Second
3.
Facebook currently intends to file a motion to dismiss the anticipated SAC (the
“Motion to Dismiss”).
5
4.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, the deadline for Facebook to file its Motion to
6
Dismiss would be 14 days after Plaintiffs file the SAC, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their
7
opposition to the Motion to Dismiss would be 14 days after Facebook files its Motion to Dismiss,
8
and the deadline for Facebook to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss would be 7
9
days after Plaintiffs’ opposition is due.
10
5.
The only previous time modifications, since the Court ordered consolidation of the
11
actions, were to extend the briefing schedule on Facebook’s motion to dismiss an earlier version
12
of Plaintiffs’ complaint (Dkt #39) and resetting the hearing date on Facebook’s motion to dismiss
13
(Dkt #51).
14
6.
Facebook believes (and I am informed that Plaintiffs believe) that a modest
15
extension of the briefing schedule on the Motion to Dismiss is reasonable in light of the
16
upcoming December holidays and the nature of the case and the claims in the anticipated SAC,
17
and such an extension will provide the Court with more thorough and useful briefing on the
18
issues.
19
20
21
22
7.
Altering the briefing schedule on the Motion to Dismiss will not affect the date or
deadline of any event or deadline already affixed by the Court.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
November 20, 2015 in Oakland, California.
23
24
/s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN
25
26
27
124068201
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
2.
GUTKIN DECL. I/S/O
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?