Sanders v. Chappell, et al

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/8/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DANNY R. SANDERS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15

UNKNOWN,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 13-0861 LHK (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

16
17

On February 26, 2013, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a letter which commenced this

18

action. The same day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that he had not paid the filing fee, nor had he

19

filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Clerk also notified Plaintiff that

20

he failed to submit a complaint. Along with the deficiency notices, Plaintiff was provided with a

21

new IFP application and instructions for completing it. Plaintiff was further cautioned that his

22

failure to either file a completed IFP application or pay the filing fee within thirty days would

23

result in the dismissal of this action. In addition, Plaintiff was advised that his failure to file a

24

complaint within thirty days would result in the dismissal of this action. To date, Plaintiff has

25

not paid his filing fee, filed a completed IFP application, or filed a complaint.

26

Thus, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter

27

judgment and close the file. The Clerk is also directed to send an electronic copy of Plaintiff’s

28
Order of Dismissal
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.13\Sanders861disifpcomp.wpd

1

original letter (Doc. No. 1), and a copy of this order to the courtroom deputy of Judge Thelton

2

Henderson.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:

4/8/13
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Dismissal
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.13\Sanders861disifpcomp.wpd

2