Arthur v. Brown et al
Filing
79
*****FILED IN ERROR*****SEE 80 ******ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 77 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2014) Modified on 8/12/2014 (mpb, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY W. ARTHUR,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 13-1097 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE OPPOSITION
(Docket No. 77)
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On July 1, 2014, defendants filed a motion for summary judgement. (Docket
19
No. 70.) On July 14, 2014, plaintiff filed an affidavit, which the court construes as a motion for
20
an extension of time to file an opposition. (Docket No. 77.) Plaintiff states he is unable to
21
conduct legal research due to an institutional lockdown and requests an additional ninety days in
22
which to file his opposition. (Id.)
23
24
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than October
14, 2014.
25
This order terminates docket no. 77.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
8/11/14
DATED: _________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.13\Arthur097eot-opp.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?