Brooks v. Cate
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 18 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 18 MOTION to Enlarge Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Responses due by 4/4/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
BRUCE BROOKS,
11
12
13
14
Petitioner,
v.
MATTHEW CATE,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 13-1352 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT
OF HABEAS CORPUS
(Docket No. 18)
15
16
On March 26, 2013, petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ
17
of habeas corpus. (Docket No. 1.) Respondent has filed a motion to enlarge the time to file a
18
response. (Docket No. 18.)
19
Having shown good cause, respondent’s motion is GRANTED. Respondent shall file an
20
answer or dispositive motion no later than April 4, 2014. Petitioner shall file a traverse within
21
thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent’s answer. If respondent files a dispositive
22
motion, petitioner shall file an opposition within twenty-eight (28) days of the filing of
23
respondent’s dispositive motion. Respondent shall file a reply within fourteen (14) days of the
24
filing date of petitioner’s opposition.
25
This order terminates docket number 18.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
2/21/14
DATED: ____________________
28
Order Granting Resp. Motion to Enlarge Time to File Response
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Brooks352eot-response.wpd
_________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?