Brooks v. Cate

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 18 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 18 MOTION to Enlarge Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Responses due by 4/4/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BRUCE BROOKS, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 13-1352 LHK (PR) ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Docket No. 18) 15 16 On March 26, 2013, petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ 17 of habeas corpus. (Docket No. 1.) Respondent has filed a motion to enlarge the time to file a 18 response. (Docket No. 18.) 19 Having shown good cause, respondent’s motion is GRANTED. Respondent shall file an 20 answer or dispositive motion no later than April 4, 2014. Petitioner shall file a traverse within 21 thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent’s answer. If respondent files a dispositive 22 motion, petitioner shall file an opposition within twenty-eight (28) days of the filing of 23 respondent’s dispositive motion. Respondent shall file a reply within fourteen (14) days of the 24 filing date of petitioner’s opposition. 25 This order terminates docket number 18. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 2/21/14 DATED: ____________________ 28 Order Granting Resp. Motion to Enlarge Time to File Response P:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Brooks352eot-response.wpd _________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?