Hernandez v. Livingston

Filing 7

ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/6/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE G. HERNANDEZ, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 BRAD LIVINGSTON, 14 Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 13-4715 LHK (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER 16 17 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison due to a 2006 19 conviction in Riverside, California, in which petitioner was sentenced to a term of life. In the 20 underlying federal habeas petition, petitioner seeks discharge from an underlying parole hold by 21 the State of Texas, which originates from a conviction petitioner sustained in El Paso, Texas. El 22 Paso, Texas, lies in the Western District of Texas. 23 Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of 24 conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, petitions challenging a conviction or sentence are 25 preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. 26 Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Here, the Western District of Texas was the district of 27 conviction and the place in which the parole hold originated. Accordingly, this case is 28 TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. See 28 Order of Transfer G:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Hernandez714trans.wpd 1 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to 2 the Western District of Texas. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 1/6/14 DATED: _______________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Transfer G:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Hernandez714trans.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?